Cult Review
Senior Film Conservator

If you're looking for a brisk, modern thriller, run the other way. This isn't for you. But if you have a soft spot for grainy, weirdly paced mid-century oddities that feel like they were filmed in a single weekend, you might actually get a kick out of this.
The whole thing feels a bit like Sea Scamps in its ambition, though with far less water and much more staring at walls. It's not a masterpiece, it’s just… there. And honestly? I kind of respect that.
Olly Gebauer looms over every frame, and not just because the camera angles are trying so hard to make him look imposing. There’s a scene about halfway through where he just sits in a chair for what feels like three full minutes. He doesn’t say a word. He just… sits.
It reminded me of the stillness you see in Mr. Thank You, but without the grace. It’s clunky. It’s heavy. It’s very 1940s.
There's a moment near the end where Fortunio Bonanova tries to explain the plot. I watched it twice and still have absolutely no clue what he was going on about. It felt less like a story point and more like he just forgot his lines and decided to improvise some philosophical gibberish.
The movie gets noticeably better once it stops trying to be a drama and just leans into being a weird, slightly uncomfortable character study. It’s got that same odd energy you find in The Vampires: Satanas, though obviously, with significantly fewer vampires.
It’s imperfect. It’s messy. I didn't hate it, but I’m probably never going to think about it again. 🎞️
1936
IMDb Rating
—

Editorial
Deciphering the legacy of transgressive cult cinema.
Community
Log in to comment.