5.2/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 5.2/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Inklings remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
Alright, so Inklings isn't going to be your Friday night blockbuster. Not by a long shot. But if you’ve got a quiet afternoon and a soft spot for history or just really neat, old-school animation, then yeah, this one’s worth a look. It’s definitely not for anyone craving fast cuts or big explosions. You’ll probably hate it if you need constant action.
What we get here is an animator, just drawing. Three big, prominent historical folks. The camera often just sits there, watching the pen scratch away at the paper. It’s got a rhythm, almost meditative, the way the lines slowly build up a face. ✏️
Then there's Lowell Thomas. His voice. Oh man, his voice. It's like hearing your favorite history teacher, but maybe from a really old radio broadcast. He’s got this rich, slightly formal tone, but it’s never stuffy. He just tells these stories, these little bits and pieces about the person being drawn.
The whole 'inklings' idea, it's pretty clever. You hear these anecdotes, right? And the drawing starts to take shape. And you're sitting there, thinking, wait a minute, is that...? Before it’s fully revealed, you often get it. That moment of recognition, even before the last stroke, is kinda satisfying.
The animation itself isn't flashy. It’s all about the ink on the page. But there’s a real charm when the drawings start to move, just a little. A subtle turn of a head, maybe an eye blink. It’s not Pixar, obviously. It’s more like a magic trick happening right there on the desk.
I remember this one bit, the narrator talking about a figure’s early struggles. A specific story about a tiny, almost forgettable failure. And on screen, the drawing just seemed to slouch a little. It was just a few lines, but it really conveyed something. That’s where it shines.
It’s not trying to be a full biography for anyone. It's more like these little snapshots, these specific feelings or moments that defined someone. We don't get a deep dive into every single thing they did. Just enough to get a taste.
Sometimes, the quiet can feel a bit too quiet. Like, you almost want the narrator to pause a bit less between sentences, but then you realize that’s part of the vibe. It lets you just sit with the image, think about what's being said.
The pacing is… deliberate. It's not trying to rush you through history. It wants you to savor the stroke of the pen, the slow unfolding of a face, the gentle reveal of a life. It’s a film that asks for your patience, and mostly, it rewards it.
Lowell Thomas, he really carries this thing. His delivery is just so smooth. You could listen to him read the phone book. He makes these historical nuggets feel fresh, even if you already knew the person. He finds the human side in these figures we often see as statues. Like, he might mention a small habit, or a funny quote, and suddenly, the drawing on screen feels a bit more alive.
You can tell a lot of thought went into picking *which* stories to tell. They aren't always the big, obvious ones. They're often the ones that give you an inkling of who the person really was, beyond the textbooks. That's the real strength here. It's not about grand statements. It's about finding those tiny, personal details.
It’s a peculiar little film. Not something you’d binge, but a nice palate cleanser. A real little gem from a time when film could be this simple, this focused. It’s a reminder that sometimes, less is truly more. Don’t expect flashy; expect thoughtful. 💭

IMDb 5
1922
Community
Log in to comment.