5.8/10
Senior Film Conservator
A definitive 5.8/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Song of the Plough remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
If you're the kind of person who likes watching old, grainy footage of tractors and sheep, you'll probably dig this. If you need explosions or a fast-paced plot to keep your eyes open, steer clear. This isn't a thriller like Sniper; it’s a slow, steady walk through a field.
Honestly, the whole thing feels like it was filmed through a layer of actual farm dust. It’s not trying to be fancy or look like the big, glossy stuff coming out of the cities. It’s just... there. It exists.
There is a scene where a character is just working the soil, and it goes on for, I don't know, maybe a full minute too long. You start to wonder if the editor just went out for a smoke break and forgot to cut. But then, you realize you're actually looking at the dirt. Like, really looking at it. 🚜
The farmers don't talk like movie stars. They mumble. They grumble. Sometimes they don't say anything at all for ages, which is a nice change from the usual talky-talky nonsense. It reminded me a bit of the quiet despair you see in The Sour Violin, only with more manure.
Stewart Rome does a solid job of looking like a man who has lost everything, even if he doesn't have a lot of lines to work with. It’s a grounded performance, not a loud one. He doesn't need to shout to show he’s miserable.
The movie doesn't have the grand, epic scale of Wonders of the Deep, but that’s fine. It feels honest. Maybe a bit too honest? There are moments where you can see the director trying to pull a message out of the mud, and it feels a bit heavy-handed. Like they’re poking you in the ribs saying, "See? This is important!"
Still, for a film from 1933, it’s got a surprising amount of soul. It doesn't treat the audience like children. It just lets you sit in the rain and the muck for a while. It’s an oddly cozy way to spend an afternoon if you don't mind a bit of grit in your teeth. 🌾
