5.5/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 5.5/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. The Fox Chase remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
If you have five or six minutes to spare and you want to see what Disney was doing before the mouse took over everything, The Fox Chase is worth a look. It’s not a masterpiece, and it’s definitely not 'important' cinema, but it’s a good time if you like watching a cartoon character get bullied by his own equipment. If you’re looking for high-brow satire of the British upper class, you’re in the wrong place. This is mostly just about a horse that refuses to be a horse.
The whole thing starts with Oswald trying to look the part. He’s got the outfit, he’s got the horn, but he’s got a horse that looks like it was assembled from spare parts and bad intentions. There is this great, awkward moment right at the start where Oswald tries to mount the horse and the horse just... moves. Not even in a particularly clever way, just a spiteful little sidestep. You can see the early animation style here—everything is round and bouncy, but there’s a weird stiffness to the horse’s legs that makes its refusal to cooperate feel more personal.
I noticed the background art is incredibly sparse. It’s basically just a few horizontal lines to represent the ground and some very lonely-looking trees. It reminds me a bit of the minimalism in His Picture in the Papers, though that was a live-action film. There’s a similar focus on the physical performance over the environment. When the chase actually starts, the physics go completely out the window. Oswald’s horse stretches out like a piece of saltwater taffy. It’s that 'rubber hose' style where bones don't exist, and while it’s a trope now, here it feels a bit frantic, like the animators were just seeing how far they could pull the character before the drawing broke.
The fox itself is a highlight. It doesn't look scared. It looks bored. There’s a bit where it hides behind a tree and just watches the dogs go by, and its expression is so blankly mocking. It’s much more competent than any of the hunters. The dogs are just a black smear of ink most of the time, moving in a single mass that feels less like a pack of animals and more like a sentient puddle. There’s one shot where the dogs all pile up on each other, and for a second, you can’t tell what you’re looking at until a tail wiggles out of the pile.
I found the middle section drags a little bit. There’s only so many times you can see Oswald fall off and climb back on before you want the plot to move to the next gag. It’s a common thing with these shorts—they find a bit that works and they just beat it into the ground. It’s not as tight as some of the other stuff from that year, but the ending makes up for it. I won't ruin the 'twist,' but it involves the fox being significantly more clever than the hunters deserved. It’s a cynical little ending that feels very much of its time.
One thing that really stuck with me was the sound—or the lack of it, depending on which version you find. Watching it silent, you really notice how much the animators relied on the rhythm of the bouncing characters. If the horse isn't moving, the scene feels dead. Everything has to be in constant, vibrating motion. It’s exhausting to watch if you’re not in the right mood. It’s much more frantic than something like Sherlock Brown, which relies on a different kind of comedic timing.
The costume on Oswald is also just weirdly tall. His hunting cap makes his head look twice as long as it should be. It’s a small detail, but once you notice it, it’s hard to look at anything else. It makes him look even more ridiculous when he’s failing to control his mount. The horse’s face, too—it has these heavy eyelids that make it look like it’s about to fall asleep while Oswald is screaming at it. It’s the best character in the short, honestly. I felt for that horse.
Is it a classic? Maybe for animation historians. For everyone else, it’s a weird, fast-paced relic that shows Disney had a sense of humor that was a lot meaner and more chaotic before they became the gold standard for family entertainment. It’s messy, the editing is a bit jumpy in the chase sequences, and the ending comes out of nowhere, but it has more personality in its five minutes than a lot of modern features manage in two hours.

IMDb —
1925
Community
Log in to comment.