United States

Is 'Why Argue?' a necessary watch for the modern comedy fan? Short answer: yes, but primarily as a historical dissection of Stan Laurel's evolving physical language. This film is for silent cinema purists and comedy historians; it is not for those who demand narrative complexity or high-definition polish. The film work...

still_frame


Comparing the cinematic DNA and archive impact of two defining moments in cult history.

Unknown Director

Unknown Director
Community
Log in to comment.
"Is 'Why Argue?' a necessary watch for the modern comedy fan? Short answer: yes, but primarily as a historical dissection of Stan Laurel's evolving physical language. This film is for silent cinema purists and comedy historians; it is not for those who demand narrative complexity or high-definition polish. The film works because it captures a pre-Hardy Laurel at his most kinetic and experimental. However, it fails because the internal logic of the gags relies on a level of repetitive violence tha..."

