Cult Review
Senior Film Conservator

If you like movies that feel like they were dug out of a basement, then yes. It’s a slow, heavy slog through drama that doesn’t care if you’re bored. If you want something snappy or fun, you will absolutely hate this.
I found myself stuck on the way the camera just sits there. It doesn’t do much fancy stuff. It just watches the actors talk. Sometimes they talk for a long time. Really long.
There is a scene near the middle where a character stands by a window and just looks outside. I swear he stood there for thirty seconds without moving. I started counting. It wasn't 'deep' or 'artistic' in the way critics usually claim. It was just a guy waiting for his cue. It felt incredibly human.
The performances are all over the place. Paco Álvarez does a lot of heavy lifting with his eyes, but then there's a supporting character who seems to be acting in a completely different movie. It’s disjointed. I kind of liked that, though. It’s not a polished product.
If you’ve seen Ruta gloriosa, you know the vibe. It’s got that same dusty, serious tone that wants you to take every line of dialogue as gospel. Sometimes it works, sometimes it’s just exhausting.
It’s not a masterpiece. It’s barely even a 'good' movie by today’s standards. But I’d take this over some sterile, big-budget mess any day. It has actual dirt under its fingernails. 🎞️
I think the director just wanted to get through the script and go home. You can feel that exhaustion in the final cut. It’s not elegant. It’s just there.
1935
IMDb Rating
—

Editorial
Deciphering the legacy of transgressive cult cinema.
Community
Log in to comment.