6.7/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 6.7/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Honor of the Family remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
If you like old movies that aren't afraid to be a bit nasty, you’ll probably find something to like here. It's definitely not for folks who need non-stop action or modern pacing. If you get bored by people sitting in rooms talking about money, maybe skip it.
I sat down to watch Honor of the Family mostly because I was curious about Warren William. This was his big talkie debut, and you can tell he’s already got that sharp, slightly oily charm he’d use for the next five years. He plays the schemer well, even if the movie around him feels a bit creaky at times.
The whole thing is based on a Balzac novel, which sounds fancy, but really it’s just a story about a family falling apart because they’re all greedy. Bebe Daniels is in the middle of it all, and she’s got this way of looking at people that makes you wonder what she’s actually plotting. She plays the outsider trying to charm the patriarch, and frankly, she’s the only one who seems to know what’s going on.
The dialogue has that weird, stagey feeling you get from a lot of 1931 films. Sometimes it feels like they’re shouting lines at each other from across a theater stage rather than just having a conversation. There’s a specific scene where the family starts arguing over the estate, and the room feels so crowded, yet everyone is standing exactly where the camera tells them to be. It’s a bit stiff, sure, but it’s kind of endearing.
Dita Parlo shows up here for her first English role. She sticks out, in a good way. She feels a little more natural than the rest of the cast, maybe because she’s not used to the American style of hamming it up yet. She brings a quietness that the movie desperately needs.
Is it a masterpiece? No. It’s a relic, really. If you’ve seen Glorious Betsy, you know that transition period between silent and sound was often a bumpy ride. This movie doesn't have the same scale as other stuff from the era, but it’s got a mean streak that makes it interesting.
It’s not perfect. The pacing drags when the characters start explaining the plot to each other for the third time. But then you get a look from Bebe Daniels, and you’re back in it. It’s a strange little time capsule, honestly. Worth a watch if you’re into the weird, messy side of early sound cinema. 🎬

IMDb —
1916
Community
Log in to comment.