Cult Review
Senior Film Conservator

Honestly, it depends on how much you like staring at old film grain. If you’re a fan of historical footage or weird, forgotten documentaries, you might get a kick out of this. If you want a narrative or anything resembling a modern point of view, stay far away. It’s a relic, plain and simple.
There isn't much of a plot here. It’s mostly just a collection of shots showing people doing their jobs. You see banana plantations, some school scenes, and a whole lot of footage of people working in the sun. It’s not exactly The Whole Town's Talking in terms of excitement.
The pacing is… well, there isn't any. It just drifts. One minute you’re looking at a group of women washing clothes, and the next you’re watching a blurry shot of a banana being cut. It feels like the director just pointed a camera and hoped for the best.
There’s this one sequence with the kindergarteners that goes on way too long. The kids look confused, the teacher looks tired, and the camera just keeps rolling. It’s almost uncomfortably quiet, even without sound. You can tell they were just trying to fill space.
It’s hard not to compare this to other stuff from that era. It lacks the punch of Putting Pants on Philip, that’s for sure. It feels way more stiff. Almost like a school project gone wrong, or a brochure that someone forgot to finish.
Some of the shots of the landscape are actually kind of pretty, though. If you ignore the context and just look at the trees, it’s nice. But then it cuts back to someone carrying a heavy basket, and you remember this isn't a vacation video. 🌴
It’s not a movie I’d recommend to friends, really. It’s more of an oddity. Like finding a strange old coin in your pocket. You look at it, you wonder where it came from, and then you put it back in the drawer. Probably won't look at it again.
Year
1935
IMDb Rating
—

Editorial
Deciphering the legacy of transgressive cult cinema.
Community
Log in to comment.