Cult Review
Senior Film Conservator

Honestly, it depends on how much emotional bruising you can handle on a Tuesday night. If you like your cinema polished, breezy, or full of heroic turns, stay away. This one is for the folks who don’t mind staring into the abyss of human desperation for an hour or so.
It’s not a film that invites you in; it kind of just drags you through the mud by your collar. The atmosphere is thick enough to choke on, which is exactly the point, I suppose. 🏚️
You can tell almost immediately that the director isn't interested in making these slums look picturesque. It feels damp. You can practically smell the mildew and the desperation coming off the screen.
Lingyu Ruan is doing some heavy lifting here with her eyes alone. There’s a specific scene near the docks where she just stares off into nothing, and you realize she’s already given up on the idea of a future. It’s haunting in a way that feels less like acting and more like a confession.
The plot point involving the landlord's son is handled with a cold, matter-of-fact tone that’s frankly chilling. There is no big dramatic music swell or long-winded speech about morality. It just happens. The transactional nature of it—swapping dignity for a few more months of rotting floorboards—is gut-wrenching.
It reminded me a bit of the bleakness you find in Otets Sergiy, where every choice feels like it’s slowly stripping away a layer of a person’s soul. You aren't watching a character grow; you’re watching them evaporate.
This isn't a movie I’d recommend to a friend to "enjoy." It’s a movie you sit with, and then you probably need to go for a long walk and look at some trees afterward. It doesn't have the manic energy of something like A Runaway Taxi, but it sticks in your ribs like a cold meal.
It’s raw. Maybe a bit too raw for its own good at times, but I’d rather have that than something fake.

IMDb —
1927
Community
Log in to comment.