Cult Review
Senior Film Conservator
If you have a soft spot for 1930s French cinema—the kind that feels like it was filmed in a basement filled with cigarette smoke and heavy velvet curtains—then sure, pull up a chair. But if you need your pacing to be snappy or your plots to make perfect sense by the third act, you’re going to be frustrated. This one is for the patient folks, or maybe just the ones who like watching Pierre Renoir chew through a scene like it's his last meal. 🕰️
Honestly, the whole thing feels a bit like digging through a dusty attic. You find some interesting trinkets, but you also spend a lot of time sneezing from all the cobwebs.
It reminds me a bit of the frantic energy in The Battle of the Century, but, you know, with way more brooding and way less pie-throwing. It lacks the punch, but keeps the tension in a weird, quiet way.
Some of the dialogue is just dreadfully stiff. It’s like the actors are reciting lines they memorized while walking through a windstorm. But then Marie Bell does something with her eyes, and suddenly you’re back in the room with them. It’s that kind of uneven experience.
I found myself wondering if they ran out of budget for the last twenty minutes. Everything just... accelerates. It’s like someone shouted, 'Wrap it up, the lights are going out!' and the characters just sprinted to the ending. 🏃♂️
Is it a masterpiece? No. Is it interesting to watch a group of people try to act their way out of a narrative corner? Definitely. Just don't go in expecting a polished, modern thriller. It’s a bit of a mess, but it’s a charming, dusty sort of mess.

Year
1936
IMDb Rating
—

Editorial
Deciphering the legacy of transgressive cult cinema.
Community
Log in to comment.