Cult Review
Senior Film Conservator

Honestly, only if you are the kind of person who enjoys clicking through grainy digital archives on a Tuesday night. It is a weird artifact. You will either love the aggressive, booming narration, or you will want to mute it after three minutes. If you are looking for a story with a beginning and an end, you will be bored stiff.
The whole thing feels like a punch in the face of information. They cram so much into so little time that it feels like the screen is vibrating. It makes Drag look like a slow-motion study by comparison.
The narration is absolutely relentless. It sounds like a man trying to outrun a train while shouting at the top of his lungs. There is no room to breathe. No silence. Just facts, dates, and dramatic pauses that feel forced.
It’s almost funny how serious they are about everything. It reminds me of the pacing in The Operator's Opera, where everything has to be high stakes or it simply doesn't exist.
I found myself wondering if this was the Giro d'Italia of newsreels—just a long, grueling stretch of people moving through different landscapes, looking tired. But at least the cyclists had bikes.
There’s a weird disconnect here. They treat these short segments like they’re uncovering deep, dark secrets, but it’s mostly just public knowledge wrapped in a dramatic bow. It’s theatrical. It’s loud. It’s definitely not subtle.
If you watch this, don’t look for deep meaning. Look for the way the camera cuts so sharply it makes you dizzy. It’s a relic, a loud one, and it certainly has its own rhythm. 🎞️
Year
1935
IMDb Rating
—

Editorial
Deciphering the legacy of transgressive cult cinema.
Community
Log in to comment.