7.1/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 7.1/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Tovarich remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
Okay, so if you're into those really old Hollywood movies, the kind where the dialogue feels like a dance, then you might just find a sweet spot with Tovarich. It’s got Claudette Colbert and Charles Boyer being all elegant and charming, even when they’re scrubbing floors. If you like a gentle, witty comedy-drama from way back, give it a shot. But if your idea of a good time involves superhero landings or car chases, then yeah, this one’s probably not for you. You'll likely hate it, actually. 😬
The setup is simple enough, and a little heartbreaking if you think about it too much. After the Russian Revolution, Count Mikhaïl (Boyer) and his wife, Grand Duchess Tatiana (Colbert), are flat broke in Paris. They’ve got this huge sum of money, mind you, but it’s entrusted to them for the Tsar, so they can’t touch it. Their solution? Become servants. It's a real fish out of water story, this one.
You see them trying to navigate a normal household, and it's just delightful. Tatiana, with her perfect posture, trying to figure out how to dust properly. Mikhaïl, a proud man, suddenly having to take orders. Colbert's face when she first puts on that maid's uniform? It's a whole story in itself. Not sad, exactly, more like a weary acceptance mixed with a flicker of this is ridiculous. 😂
Their employers, the Duponts, are this very French, very bourgeois family. They have no idea they've hired actual Russian nobility. There's this one moment where Madame Dupont is complaining about something trivial, and Tatiana just gives this tiny, almost imperceptible sigh. You can feel the weight of a lost empire in that little breath.
Charles Boyer, he’s just smooth. Even as a butler, he carries himself with such dignity. You see him polishing silverware, and he makes it look like a philosophical exercise. His eyes sometimes have this faraway look, like he's still seeing his palace, not the Duponts' dining room. It's subtle, but it's there.
Then Basil Rathbone shows up as General Borzin. He's always good for a bit of menace or at least a strong presence. Here, he's another exiled Russian, aware of the couple's true identity, and he adds a layer of tension. Is he going to expose them? What does he want? His scenes really pick up the pace a bit, pulling you away from the charming domestic squabbles into something a bit more dramatic. 🕵️
The film has a funny way of making you root for them, even when they’re being a little stubborn about their old ways. There’s a scene where they’re trying to sneak some food to an old Russian general who’s starving, and it just shows their true character. They could use their hidden money, but they stick to their principles. That's actually kinda cool.
Sometimes, the humor feels a little slow by today's standards. A few jokes land more with a polite chuckle than a big laugh. But then there's a quick line, or a look between Colbert and Boyer, that just clicks. They have such a natural chemistry, it really makes the whole thing work. They don't need grand gestures; a raised eyebrow or a shared glance tells you everything. ✨
The sets are pretty standard for a Parisian household of the era, nothing too fancy, which actually helps ground their predicament. You really get the feeling of them being normal people in a normal house, even though they're anything but. One detail I kinda loved was the way the maids' caps were perched. So precise, even if the maid wearing it was a grand duchess.
It’s not a movie that will change your life, or even one that gets talked

IMDb —
1924
Community
Log in to comment.