
Charles Reisner’s Happy Daze is less a motion picture than a stroboscopic migraine of 1923, a film that seems to have been spliced together from the discarded nightmares of a Coney Island barker and the perfumed daydreams of a gin-soaked flapper. Existing prints—those that survived the nitrate bonfires—pulse with a p...


Comparing the cinematic DNA and archive impact of two defining moments in cult history.

Charles Reisner

Maurice Campbell
Community
Log in to comment.
" Charles Reisner’s Happy Daze is less a motion picture than a stroboscopic migraine of 1923, a film that seems to have been spliced together from the discarded nightmares of a Coney Island barker and the perfumed daydreams of a gin-soaked flapper. Existing prints—those that survived the nitrate bonfires—pulse with a phosphorescent glow, as though every frame were dunked in absinthe and held up to a magnesium flare. The first thing that strikes you is the tempo: not the measured, Keatonesque rh..."

