Is this worth your time? If you have seven minutes to spare and want to see how much rubbery nonsense an animator can pack into a frame, sure. It’s pure 1932 comfort food for fans of the early stuff. If you need a coherent story or realistic physics, keep walking. There is something inherently bizarre about the early ...
still_frame
Comparing the cinematic DNA and archive impact of two defining moments in cult history.
Ub Iwerks
Unknown Director
Community
Log in to comment.
"Is this worth your time? If you have seven minutes to spare and want to see how much rubbery nonsense an animator can pack into a frame, sure. It’s pure 1932 comfort food for fans of the early stuff. If you need a coherent story or realistic physics, keep walking. There is something inherently bizarre about the early Mickey shorts. They operate on a dream logic where everything—fire hydrants, chairs, actual dogs—is just a prop waiting to be bent out of shape. Mickey is trying to be a gentleman,..."
