Cult Review
Senior Film Conservator

Honestly, only if you have a soft spot for 1930s European cinema and don't mind when a movie forgets to explain itself. If you're looking for a tight, punchy script, you'll probably want to turn this off about twenty minutes in. But for those who like the feeling of digging through an old trunk of someone else's memories? Sure, give it a go.
The whole thing feels like it was filmed through a slightly dusty lens. Marcelle Chantal is doing a lot of heavy lifting here with just her eyes. Sometimes she holds a look for so long I started wondering if the reel had stuck in the projector.
It’s nowhere near as kinetic as Arshin mal-alan, which has a completely different energy entirely. While that film is busy bouncing off the walls, Antonia prefers to sit in the corner and sigh loudly.
Fernand Gravey is there, looking handsome and mostly just existing in the frame. He doesn't have much to do, which feels like a waste of the guy. You get the sense the director just told him to stand near the curtains and look vaguely troubled.
I found myself thinking about Maciste in Hell halfway through. Not because they’re similar—they couldn't be more different—but because I really missed the sheer, ridiculous confidence of that movie. Antonia is too polite for its own good.
The pacing is… well, it’s not really pacing. It’s more of a gentle drift. Sometimes a conversation ends, and the screen just cuts to a shot of a garden for way too long. Maybe the editor was taking a lunch break? 🤷♂️
Is it a masterpiece? No. Is it the worst thing I've seen this month? Not even close. It’s just one of those movies that exists in the gray space between 'forgotten classic' and 'should stay forgotten.'
If you watch it, pay attention to the way the characters walk through doorways. It’s all very choreographed, like they’re afraid to bump into the furniture. It’s weirdly hypnotic once you notice it.

IMDb 6.7
1934