Cult Review
Senior Film Conservator

If you like oddball archival stuff or have ever worked in customer service and needed a good laugh at the expense of the public, then yes, watch this. If you want a narrative with an arc or characters that evolve, keep scrolling. You will probably hate this if you take your cinema too seriously or think everything needs a point.
There is something inherently voyeuristic about reading someone else’s mail. Especially when that mail is this spectacularly dim-witted. It’s not exactly high art, but it’s a weird, punchy reminder that the internet didn't invent stupidity—it just gave it a megaphone.
The pacing is fast, thankfully. It doesn't overstay its welcome. It reminds me a bit of the frantic energy you see in Hoi Polloi, where things just happen because the creators decided they should.
It’s not a masterpiece. It’s just a funny curiosity. The kind of thing you’d find playing in a dark corner of an archive and stop to watch for five minutes while eating a sandwich. 🥪
It lacks the visual panache of Moulin Rouge, obviously. But it’s got a weird, dry charm. It doesn't try to be profound, which is its biggest strength. It just presents the absurdity and lets you sit with it. Sometimes that’s enough.
Honestly, I kept thinking about how these letters are the 1930s version of a bad email thread. Same energy, just more paper involved. It makes me feel better about my own typos, at least.
Don't look for a plot. It’s not there. It’s just a parade of lollapaloozas. Pure, unadulterated nonsense.
1935
IMDb Rating
—

Editorial
Deciphering the legacy of transgressive cult cinema.
Community
Log in to comment.