6.2/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 6.2/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Master Hands remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
Honestly, you probably know within the first thirty seconds if you’re going to love Master Hands. If you get a kick out of watching old machinery move and seeing men in crisp shirts doing things with their hands that machines do now, you’re in. If you need, I don't know, a narrative arc or a protagonist who isn't a V8 engine block, you’re going to be bored out of your mind. 🥱
It’s not quite a documentary, and it’s definitely not a story. It’s more like a rhythmic, metallic trance.
There’s this strange, almost musical quality to the way the editing cuts from a gear turning to a wrench tightening. It’s not as chaotic as On the Go, which feels way more scattered. Here, everything feels like it was choreographed by someone who really, really loves steel.
I found myself staring at a guy soldering a door panel for way too long. The way the sparks fly looks like an accidental firework show. It’s beautiful in a way that feels completely unintentional.
Sometimes the camera gets so close you lose track of what part of the car you're even looking at. Is it the chassis? A fender? Who cares. It looks like a giant, pulsing clock.
There's a moment where a line of engines moves past the camera like a conveyor belt of ghosts. It’s oddly sad. It reminds me a bit of the frantic energy in Obey the Law, but stripped of all the moralizing. Just work. Just motion.
It’s weirdly comforting, honestly. In a world where everything is digital and hidden inside black boxes, seeing someone physically wrestle a car frame into place feels… grounded. 🛠️
Don't look for a hidden meaning. There isn't one. It’s just 1936, a lot of sparks, and a hell of a lot of Chevrolets.