6.9/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 6.9/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. The King's Vacation remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
You should definitely watch this today if you like those old movies that feel like a warm blanket and a cup of tea. It is perfect for a rainy afternoon when you don't want to think too hard.
If you hate slow-moving stories where people stand around in fancy suits talking about their feelings, you will probably be bored out of your mind. It is very much a 'stage play' turned into a movie.
George Arliss is the main guy here, playing King Philip. He has this very specific way of moving his hands that makes him look like he’s constantly trying to catch an invisible fly.
The plot is pretty simple. He’s a king, he’s bored, and he realizes he doesn't actually do anything important except sign papers and look regal.
So, he just quits. He abdicates the throne and goes back to find the woman he loved before he was famous, back when he was just a regular guy.
I love how easy he makes it look. He just hands over the crown like he’s returning a library book that’s a few days overdue.
The movie really picks up when he gets to the seaside cottage. It’s supposed to be this humble place, but because it’s a 1930s movie, it still looks way nicer than my actual apartment.
He finds his ex-wife, Margaret, played by Florence Arliss. Fun fact: they were married in real life too, which explains why they have this very comfortable bickering energy.
They have a daughter together, played by Patricia Ellis. She’s fine, but she does that high-pitched 1930s acting where she sounds like she’s constantly about to sneeze.
Then there is Dick Powell. He shows up as the daughter's boyfriend, and he is so young here it’s almost distracting.
He hasn't quite figured out his 'movie star' face yet. He just looks like a happy puppy who wandered onto the set by mistake.
The movie is a bit like An Old Fashioned Boy in the way it tries to be wholesome, but it’s actually a bit smarter than that. It understands that you can't really go backward in time.
I noticed this one scene where Philip is trying to enjoy a simple meal, and he keeps looking at the clock. It’s a small thing, but it shows how he’s still stuck in his old royal schedule even though he’s 'free'.
There is also a very strange moment where a character mentions a 'socialist revolution' happening back at the palace. It’s treated like a minor inconvenience, like a bad weather report, which cracked me up.
The pacing is a bit weird. It feels like it’s dragging in the middle when they are walking on the beach, and then the ending happens so fast you might blink and miss it.
It’s definitely not as sharp as Maybe It's Love, which has a bit more bite to it. This one is much softer around the edges.
One thing that annoyed me was the sound quality. There’s a constant hissing in the background of the outdoor scenes that sounds like someone is frying bacon just off-camera.
But Arliss makes it worth it. He has this dry, sarcastic wit that feels very modern, even if the rest of the movie feels like a dusty antique.
I kept thinking about Beware of Blondes while watching the daughter's scenes. She isn't a 'femme fatale' or anything, but she has that same kind of dramatic flair that was so popular back then.
The movie doesn't try to be a big political statement. It’s just a story about a guy who realizes that being a 'nobody' is actually a lot of work too.
It’s way more grounded than something like Ivanhoe, which is all about the spectacle. Here, the biggest 'action' scene is a man deciding which chair to sit in.
I wish they had spent more time on the relationship between Philip and his daughter. They have one or two good scenes, but then she’s mostly just there to give Dick Powell someone to talk to.
There’s a bit of a 'grass is greener' vibe that feels very real. He thinks he wants the simple life, but then he realizes he misses the good tea and the people waiting on him.
It reminds me of the tone in Marriage by Contract, where people are trying to figure out these complicated social rules and failing miserably.
The cinematography is... well, it’s 1933. It’s mostly just people standing in the middle of the frame talking. But the lighting in the palace scenes is actually pretty moody and nice.
I did find myself checking how much time was left around the 45-minute mark. It’s a short movie, but it feels longer because it’s so quiet. ☕
If you’re looking for a masterpiece, this isn't it. But if you want to see a very talented old actor have a bit of fun with a silly premise, it’s a good use of an hour.
It’s kind of sweet, kind of forgettable, but mostly just pleasant. And sometimes pleasant is enough. 👑

IMDb —
1914
Community
Log in to comment.