Cult Review
Senior Film Conservator

Honestly? Maybe. If you like movies that feel like a rainy Tuesday in a place you’ve never been, you’ll dig it. If you need a plot that moves at more than a walking pace, you’re going to be checking your watch every five minutes. It’s definitely not for the popcorn-chugging crowd.
There’s this scene about halfway through where Alekper Melikov just sits by a window for way too long. The light hits the dust motes in the air, and you realize the director isn’t planning on cutting away anytime soon. It’s stubborn. I kind of loved it, but I also wanted to stand up and stretch.
It has this grainy, lived-in texture that reminds me a bit of the mood in A Fallen Idol, but much colder. The performances are incredibly restrained. Sometimes they are so restrained that you wonder if they forgot their lines, but then a look or a twitch of a hand hits you harder than a shout would have.
The pacing is a disaster if you look at it through a textbook, but it works if you just let it happen. It doesn’t feel like it’s trying to be profound, which is the best part. It’s just trying to be itself.
It’s a bit like watching The Devious Path, only if everyone decided to stop talking halfway through and just stared at the wallpaper. Strange, but memorable.
I don’t think I’d watch it twice, but I’m glad I saw it once. It’s one of those films that leaves a little bit of grit in your teeth. 🎞️
—

Editorial
Deciphering the legacy of transgressive cult cinema.
Community
Log in to comment.