DbcultAccessing Vault...
5.5/10
Senior Film Conservator
A definitive 5.5/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Young Eagles remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
Honestly? Only if you have a weird itch for 1930s aviation tropes or want to see what passed for 'adventure' back when movies were still figuring out how to cut between scenes. If you need pacing, character arcs, or logic, stay away. This is for the kind of person who enjoys staring at grainy black-and-white stock footage of clouds.
The whole premise hinges on a 'crack aviator' who somehow forgets to put fuel in his plane. It’s the kind of professional incompetence that would make a delivery driver lose their job, but here, it’s just the plot starter. Classic.
The Scouts are exactly what you expect—earnest, polite, and completely out of their depth. They spend half the runtime looking confused at the scenery. Watching them try to act tough in the jungle is like watching kids play house, except with more malaria risks.
The pacing is… well, it’s not really there. It just kind of wanders. It reminded me a bit of the aimless energy in Go West, but without the jokes. It’s just a lot of people standing around in uncomfortable uniforms while the sun beats down.
There is a moment where the plane finally hits the ground—or, well, lands in a pile of brush—and the reaction shot from the boys is just bizarrely calm. Like they’re waiting for a bus instead of surviving a plane crash. Too much composure, guys.
It’s not a good movie. It’s not even a particularly interesting bad one. But there’s a strange charm to how hollow it feels, like a ghost of a story someone tried to tell while they were distracted by something else. ✈️
If you've sat through Winners of the Wilderness, you know the drill. This is just smaller, dustier, and significantly less interested in its own characters. Skip it unless you’re doing some deep-dive into early scout-themed cinema.