I think you should probably watch this if you have a soft spot for those 1930s mysteries where everyone looks slightly suspicious just by breathing. If you're looking for high-octane action or something that makes sense every second, you’re gonna hate it. 🕵️♂️ It is definitely for the crowd that enjoys dusty library...
Comparing the cinematic DNA and archive impact of two defining moments in cult history.
Raffaello Matarazzo
Eduardo Notari
Community
Log in to comment.
"I think you should probably watch this if you have a soft spot for those 1930s mysteries where everyone looks slightly suspicious just by breathing. If you're looking for high-octane action or something that makes sense every second, you’re gonna hate it. 🕵️♂️ It is definitely for the crowd that enjoys dusty library aesthetics and people arguing in suits. It’s a bit clunky, but honestly, that’s part of why I liked it. The whole thing centers on this company, Roylott, which sounds like someth..."
Guglielmo Giannini
Italy
