Robert Kincairn, the dissolute son of a British colonel, is gallant enough to take the blame for a robbery perpetrated by his fiancee Enid. Thrown out of his home, he changes his name and join the army.
Short answer: Yes, but it’s not without its flaws. This 1926 film is a relic of a bygone era, yet it offers a glimpse into the charming and often melodramatic storytelling of early Hollywood. This film works because its plot is rooted in the themes of redemption and the complexities of family honor. It fails because of...
still_frame
Comparing the cinematic DNA and archive impact of two defining moments in cult history.
Sidney Olcott
Sidney Olcott
Community
Log in to comment.
"Short answer: Yes, but it’s not without its flaws. This 1926 film is a relic of a bygone era, yet it offers a glimpse into the charming and often melodramatic storytelling of early Hollywood. This film works because its plot is rooted in the themes of redemption and the complexities of family honor. It fails because of its somewhat predictable narrative and dated dialogue. You should watch it if you are interested in early 20th-century cinema and its exploration of personal and familial honor. ..."
Violet E. Powell, Agnes Pat McKenna, Jerome N. Wilson
United States
Deep dive into the cult classic
Discover similar cinematic experiences
A Directorial Spotlight on Sidney Olcott
