6.2/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 6.2/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Anybody's Woman remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
If you have about eighty minutes to spare and you actually like movies where people make terrible life choices while wearing fancy clothes, then yes, this is worth your time. You'll probably enjoy it if you like pre-code movies that feel a bit raw and unpolished. If you hate slow pacing or that weird 1930s 'stagey' acting, you’re gonna have a bad time. 🥂
Ruth Chatterton plays Pansy, and she is basically the whole movie. She's this chorus girl who lives in the same apartment building as Neil, played by Clive Brook.
Neil is a lawyer who is very rich and very miserable because his wife left him. He gets completely hammered one night—and I mean properly smashed—and wakes up the next morning to find out he married Pansy.
The first thing I noticed is how loud Pansy is compared to everyone else. It’s not just the volume of her voice, it's her whole vibe. She’s messy and honest in a way that makes all the rich people in the movie look like they’re made of cardboard.
This movie came out right at the start of sound, and you can really feel it. Sometimes the actors stand really still because they’re clearly trying to talk directly into a microphone hidden in a lamp or something. 🎙️
It has that same clunky energy you see in Smilin' Through, where the silence between lines feels like it lasts a decade. But honestly? It kind of works here because the situation is so awkward.
There is this one scene where Pansy is trying to eat dinner with Neil’s fancy friends. She’s wearing this dress that is just a little too much and her jewelry clanks every time she moves. I felt physically uncomfortable watching it, which I guess was the point.
Clive Brook plays the husband like he’s got a broomstick taped to his spine. He is so stiff! I kept waiting for him to crack a smile, but he just looks like he’s smelling something bad for most of the runtime.
I dont know if I’d call it a 'good' movie in the modern sense, but it’s interesting. It deals with class stuff in a way that feels way more cynical than movies made just five years later once the censors took over.
It reminds me a bit of the character dynamics in Three Women, where everyone is just kind of using each other. 🎭
One thing that really stuck out to me was the maid. She doesn't have many lines, but her facial expressions while watching Pansy try to be a 'lady' are hilarious. She’s definitely judging everyone in that house.
The movie gets way better once you realize it's not trying to be a romance. It’s more of a tragedy about two people who have absolutely nothing in common being stuck together because of a bottle of gin.
I noticed the camera doesn't move much. It’s like the director was afraid if he moved it, the whole set would fall over. Most scenes are just two people sitting on a sofa talking at each other.
Sometimes the dialogue is actually pretty sharp. Pansy has these great one-liners where she calls out the hypocrisy of the rich folks. She knows they think she's 'trash,' and she doesn't really care. 💅
There’s a moment where Pansy is looking at a portrait of Neil’s ex-wife. The way the camera lingers on her face—you can tell she feels like she’ll never be enough for this world. It’s a rare quiet moment in a movie that’s usually pretty loud.
If you're into film history, you should check it out just to see Ruth Chatterton. She was a massive star back then, and you can see why. She has this spark that makes everyone else on screen look like they’re sleepwalking.
It’s a bit of a mess, but it’s a human mess. It isn't perfect, and the sound quality is a bit scratchy, but it felt real to me. Much more real than some of the polished stuff that came out later.
Anyway, if you like seeing a chorus girl tell a bunch of snobs to shove it, give it a watch. Just dont expect a happy, bubbly musical. It's darker than it looks on the poster. 🎬

IMDb 6.9
1920
Community
Log in to comment.