3.2/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 3.2/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Arizona Trails remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
Is it worth watching today? Only if you have a very specific itch for 1930s dust and guys who take their card games way too seriously.
If you like those old Poverty Row westerns where the horses look more tired than the actors, you will probably get a kick out of this. If you need high-definition action or a plot that makes 100% sense, you should probably just skip it.
The movie starts with Henry Randolph. He is young, he is broke, and he has been gambling with a guy named Slade.
Slade is the kind of villain who probably kicks puppies in his spare time. He has that look. You know the one.
Henry owes money, and Slade threatens to tell Henry’s dad. For some reason, this is the worst thing that could possibly happen to Henry.
The scene where they argue is actually pretty funny. The audio is a bit scratchy, so it sounds like they are arguing inside a tin can.
Henry gets all tough and threatens Slade back. It is the classic "I'll kill you!" moment that immediately makes you the prime suspect in a movie like this.
Anyway, Slade ends up dead. Big surprise, right?
The discovery of the body is handled with all the grace of a middle school play. People just sort of gather around and point. 🤠
The posse forms almost instantly. It feels like these guys were just waiting behind a bush for someone to get murdered so they could go for a ride.
Henry says he is innocent. He says it a lot.
But then, he immediately bolts. If I was innocent, I probably wouldn't run away from the guys with guns, but Henry isn't exactly a genius.
The chase scenes are where the movie really spends its time. There is a lot of footage of people riding horses up hills and then riding them back down different hills.
I swear I saw the same jagged rock in the background at least four times. It’s like the movie is on a loop.
It reminds me a little bit of the pacing in Sky High Corral. Just a lot of movement without much actually happening.
There is a specific moment where one of the posse members almost falls off his horse during a turn. They kept it in the movie. I love that.
It’s these little mistakes that make these old films feel real. No one was doing twenty takes back then.
The acting from Wallace Pindell is... okay. He looks worried. He stays worried for about forty minutes straight.
I think he might have actually been worried about his paycheck. These studios weren't known for paying well.
If you’ve seen something like Some Boy, you know the vibe. It’s quick, cheap, and meant to be forgotten by next Tuesday.
There is a scene where Henry is hiding and he looks right at the camera for a split second. It’s like he’s asking the audience for help.
The music is also very dramatic. It doesn't always match what is happening on screen.
Like, they’ll be having a quiet conversation and the violins are screaming like a shark is about to attack. It's great.
I also noticed that the "gambling debt" is never really explained. How much did he owe? Five dollars? A thousand? It doesn't matter, I guess.
The movie is only about an hour long. That is the perfect length for this kind of story.
Any longer and you’d start noticing how many times they reuse the same three locations. It’s basically just three different clumps of dirt.
I wonder if the writers of The Pride of the Legion ever hung out with Tom Camden. They all seemed to have the same "let's just get it done" attitude.
One thing that bugged me was the way they found evidence. It’s always just sitting right there on the ground in plain sight.
The sheriff in this town must be the luckiest guy alive. Or the laziest.
"I didn't do it, I tell ya!" — Henry, roughly every five minutes.
The ending is exactly what you think it is. I won't spoil it, but let's just say justice is served in a very convenient way.
It’s not as atmospheric as something like London After Midnight, obviously. It’s just a plain old western.
The cast is full of guys like Bill Patton and Herman Hack. These guys lived in these movies. They probably didn't even take the costumes off when they went home.
I enjoyed the rawness of it. You can see the dust kicking up into the camera lens sometimes.
It makes you feel like you need to wash your face after watching it. 🌵
Is it a good movie? Not really. Is it an entertaining way to spend an hour if you like old stuff? Yeah, sure.
Just don't expect it to change your life. It’s just a story about a guy who shouldn't have played cards with a jerk named Slade.
I’ve seen worse. Much worse. At least this one has a lot of energy even when the plot is tripping over itself.
I’ll probably forget the character names by tomorrow. But I’ll remember that one horse that looked bored. He was the real hero.

IMDb —
1924
Community
Log in to comment.