Cult Review
Senior Film Conservator

If you have a soft spot for classic cinema that feels like it was filmed in a different century—which, well, it was—then Banknote is a solid pick. It’s not for the folks who need a cut every three seconds to stay awake. If you prefer your drama served with a side of theatrical, slightly over-the-top acting, you’ll probably dig it.
If you hate subtitles or films that take their sweet time setting up a shot, stay far away. You will be bored to tears. Personally, I found the slow pace kind of relaxing, even when the plot started getting a bit muddy.
The cinematography has this weird, flickering quality. It reminds me a bit of the grainy texture in Life and Passion of Christ, though obviously a different kind of vibe entirely. Sometimes the shadows are so deep you can barely see the actors' eyes. I kept squinting at the screen, which probably made me look like an idiot.
Fouad El Rachidi is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. There’s a scene where he’s just sitting at a desk, looking at a piece of paper, and I swear he held that expression for a full minute. It’s the kind of deliberate, awkward pause that would get cut in a modern edit, but here? It works. It makes the guy seem like he’s actually thinking.
It’s not perfect. The story sort of loses its steam right when you think it’s about to hit a climax. It reminds me a little of the aimlessness in Three Foolish Weeks, where you’re just happy to be along for the ride without needing a clear destination.
Is it a masterpiece? No. Is it a fascinating piece of history? Yeah, I think so. Sometimes it’s nice to watch a movie that isn't trying to sell you a franchise. 🎥
Year
1936
IMDb Rating
—

Editorial
Deciphering the legacy of transgressive cult cinema.
Community
Log in to comment.