4.9/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 4.9/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Buddy's Circus remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
If you like movies that feel like they were stitched together with duct tape and good intentions, you might actually get a kick out of Buddy’s Circus. It is not for the person who needs high-budget polish or a tight, logical script.
If you prefer your cinema clean and professional, you are going to hate this. It is clunky, occasionally baffling, and charming in a way that feels like a mistake. 🎪
The whole thing hinges on a moment where a baby falls from the stands, which sounds dramatic on paper. On screen, the editing makes the jump feel like it happens in slow-motion, which is either a brilliant artistic choice or just a complete lack of footage.
Jack Carr plays Buddy with this look of constant, mild confusion. I’m not sure if he’s acting or if he just forgot his lines, but it works.
Watching this made me think of the frantic, low-stakes energy in Heebee Jeebees. Both films have that same quality of people just trying to finish the scene before the sun goes down.
There’s a sequence where the circus acts are meant to be performing, but the camera just pans over a bunch of empty benches for a solid ten seconds. It’s very awkward. Maybe the extras all left for lunch?
Jane Withers does her best to anchor the chaos, but the movie keeps drifting away from her. It is as if the director didn't quite know what story they were telling half the time.
It reminds me a bit of the disjointed pacing in Bachelor Bait, where the plot takes a back seat to just seeing what happens next.
Is it great? No. But it isn't boring. It’s got this weird, dusty smell of sawdust and old film stock that stays with you. I don't regret watching it, even if I have no idea why half the things in this movie actually happened.
Sometimes you don't need a masterpiece. You just need to see someone try to catch a falling baby while a tiger looks on, totally uninterested. 🦁