Cult Review
Senior Film Conservator
Honestly? Only if you’re a completist for 1930s French comedies. It’s light, it’s fluffy, and it moves with the urgency of a snail in a heavy rainstorm. If you like your movies snappy like Noble Sissle and Eubie Blake Sing Snappy Songs, you’re going to be frustrated by how much time they spend just… existing.
But there’s a sweet, weird energy here that makes it hard to completely write off. It feels like a stage play that someone forgot to edit down. 🎞️
The whole thing starts with the classic "happily ever after" trope, but we all know that’s just a setup for trouble. When the bank goes sideways, watching her switch from 'newlywed' back to 'office workhorse' is the only part that really feels human.
The chemistry between the leads is… fine. It’s not electric, but it’s polite. Sometimes it feels like they’re acting in two different movies that happen to be sharing the same set.
It’s not as sharp as some of the other stuff from that era. Compared to the punchy vibe of Koko Trains 'Em, this feels like it’s wading through molasses. You can practically hear the director yelling 'keep it moving' while the actors are just enjoying their coffee.
The movie is obsessed with the idea that work and love can’t exist in the same room. It’s a very 1934 way of looking at the world. You’ll find yourself rolling your eyes at the "bank trouble" dialogue, which is mostly just people shouting numbers at each other.
It’s definitely no Bigamie, that’s for sure. It’s just a simple, slightly dated story that works best if you don't think too hard about the economics of the plot.
Stick with it for the costumes, though. The fashion is honestly the most interesting character in the whole flick. 🎩✨

Year
1934
IMDb Rating
—

Editorial
Deciphering the legacy of transgressive cult cinema.
Community
Log in to comment.