6.3/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 6.3/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Fascination remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
Right, so we're talking about Fascination from 1931. Is it worth your time today? Look, if you’re a devotee of early British talkies or you're specifically tracking Madeleine Carroll’s early career, then yes, probably. For casual viewers just dipping into old films? You might find it a bit of a slow burn, honestly. It’s got a very specific kind of charm, but it’s not for everyone.
The setup is classic melodrama. A seemingly happy couple, played by Madeleine Carroll and Kenneth Kove, are living their quiet lives. Then, a “vampish” actress, Kay Hammond, shows up and stirs everything up. You just know from the moment she glides into the room that trouble's brewing. 🍷
Madeleine Carroll, as the wife, is really the anchor here. She brings this understated elegance to a role that could’ve easily been over-the-top. When she starts suspecting her husband, you see it in these little shifts in her eyes, a tightening of her jaw. It’s not dramatic sobbing, which is refreshing for the era. She carries so much emotion just in her presence. Like, she's trying to keep it together, you know?
Kenneth Kove plays the husband, and honestly, he's a bit of a chump. He falls for Hammond's character way too fast. You kinda wonder what the wife saw in him to begin with. He’s just so easily flattered, so easily led astray. It feels less like a deep betrayal and more like… a man being terribly silly. The film doesn't give him much depth, just a guy who gets his head turned.
Kay Hammond as the “other woman” tries to embody this irresistible allure. She’s got the smoky eyes and the knowing smiles. She’s definitely playing the part of a seductress. But sometimes, her performance feels a tad forced, like the script keeps telling us she’s enchanting, but the actions don’t always quite sell it. It's almost as if the film is trying to convince itself she's dangerous. 🤔
There's this one moment where Carroll's character is sitting alone, just after a particularly tense conversation. The camera just lingers. The silence in that old film recording, it's heavy. You can almost hear the thoughts swirling in her head, the realization settling in. It’s a very simple shot, but effective.
The dialogue is so proper, very 1930s British. Some lines feel a bit stilted to modern ears. It makes you realize how much conversational norms have shifted. People really did talk like that, I guess. Or at least, they did in the movies.
And the whole “vamp” thing… it’s a trope, right? The film leans into it hard. Hammond’s character isn’t really given a chance to be anything but the catalyst for marital strife. She doesn't have much of an inner life. It's all about her effect on the husband.
Oh, and little Freddie Bartholomew is in this! For about thirty seconds. He’s a child. He delivers maybe two lines. It's one of those blink-and-you-miss-it appearances. Clearly, a very early role, maybe even before his big Hollywood splash. It's a fun little tidbit for movie trivia, but don't expect a performance.
The pacing is… deliberate. It’s not rushing anywhere. The scenes play out, sometimes a little longer than you'd expect, letting the awkwardness or the tension really settle. It feels a bit like watching a filmed stage play, honestly. The camera setups are often very static. They just let the actors do their thing.
Overall, Fascination is a curious watch if you appreciate these early sound experiments. It’s not a masterpiece, no. But Carroll's performance alone gives it a certain weight. It’s a glimpse into the social anxieties of the time, I suppose, about outsiders disrupting the domestic sphere. Not a film that demands your full attention, but one that offers some quiet rewards if you’re patient. It kinda just is what it is. 🤷♀️

IMDb 6
1928
Community
Log in to comment.