Cult Review
Senior Film Conservator

Honestly, only if you are a weirdo for Swedish political history or specifically want to see how cinema was used to sell policy shifts in the past. If you are looking for a normal movie with, you know, actual stakes or human chemistry, you are going to hate this. It is dry. It is incredibly dry. It makes a lecture on tax codes feel like an action flick.
The whole premise hinges on a young couple arguing about a Social Democratic bill involving coffee and gasoline. Yes, you read that right. They are so worked up about fuel prices and caffeine access that they decide to ditch their current leanings and join the Ungsvenska rörelsen. It’s a bit like watching a couple break up because they can’t agree on a pizza topping, except here the topping is national economic policy. ☕️
The dialogue is painfully wooden. It feels less like a conversation between two people in love and more like two robots reading pamphlets to each other in a dimly lit room. There is a moment where the guy is staring out a window, probably trying to look thoughtful, but he just looks like he’s waiting for the bus. It’s a very staged kind of drama.
If you have seen Tacks and Taxes, you might recognize that specific brand of earnest, slightly annoying moralizing. At least that one had a bit more punch to it. This one just kind of plods along until they finally reach their political awakening. It isn't a film; it is a pamphlet that learned how to project images.
It’s not often you see a movie that takes itself this seriously about fuel prices. It’s almost impressive how little fun they manage to have. The whole thing lacks the charm you find in, say, The Shimmy Gym, where at least people were moving around instead of just sitting there, vibrating with political intensity.
Would I watch it again? Not in a million years. It feels like someone took a boring committee meeting and tried to add a 'romance' filter over it. Pass.

IMDb —
1921