Cult Review
Senior Film Conservator

If you like weird, creaky, old-school French cinema, then maybe. It feels like finding a dusty book in an attic. If you need modern pacing or anything that moves faster than a polite stroll, you’ll probably hate it within ten minutes. It’s definitely not for everyone, and it doesn't even try to be.
The whole premise is wild. A guy from the Napoleonic wars gets frozen and then thawed out later. It’s like a low-budget, cranky version of a sci-fi flick. Honestly, watching him try to adjust to the 20th century is genuinely awkward. Not in a bad way, just in a 'this feels like watching a relative try to use a smartphone' kind of way.
There’s this one scene where he’s just sitting there, trying to make sense of the modern furniture, and the camera just won't move. It lingers. It lingers so long that you start to wonder if the projectionist fell asleep. It’s kind of hypnotic, though.
The acting is very... theatrical. Everyone is projecting like they’re trying to reach the back row of a massive theater, even when they’re standing two feet apart in a tiny living room. It gives the whole thing this bizarre, hyper-real feeling.
It’s a strange movie. It’s definitely not a masterpiece. It doesn't even really try to hold your hand. But there’s something about the way it just exists that I kinda liked. It’s flawed, it’s slow, and it’s totally stuck in its own weird little timeline. 🕰️
I don't think I'll ever watch it again, but I'm glad I did. It’s just one of those movies you stumble into on a rainy day when you don't want to watch anything with a budget over twenty bucks.
Year
1935
IMDb Rating
—

Editorial
Deciphering the legacy of transgressive cult cinema.
Community
Log in to comment.