DbcultAccessing Vault...
Cult Review
Archivist John
Senior Editor
A reel of Little Miss No-Account unfurls like a soot-smudged lithograph: every frame etched with nickelodeon frenzy, every intertitle crackling with Victorian guilt. Viewed today, the 1917 one-reeler feels less a relic than a clandestine map to America’s original gilded nightmare—property lust masquerading as paternal guardianship. The plot, deceptively penny-dreadful, spirals into a Kafkaesque custody battle where bricks, not blood, carry chromosomes.
Director Frank O’Connor—better known then as a character actor—treats the Washington Square set like a dollhouse slammed by a sledgehammer. Dutch angles appear a full decade before German Expressionism stormed Hollywood, tilting parlors so violently that chandeliers swing like gibbets. Josiah Wheeler’s gambling den, rendered in sea-blue tint (#0E7490), pulses beneath strata of cigar haze; the tint shifts to bilious yellow (#EAB308) whenever Patty’s inheritance is mentioned—an early, subconscious form of color psychology.
Gladys Leslie—barely seventeen—plays Patty with feral minimalism. Watch her pupils dilate when she first strokes the deed: it’s an erotic awakening filmed in extreme close-up, a shot so intimate that nickelodeon managers reportedly censored it in Boston. Her runaway sequence is a master-class in kinetic despair: she ricochets off pushcarts, hugs a scarred elm in Washington Arch Park as if it were a mother’s ribcage, then collapses into a pile of snow that the camera reveals to be discarded newspaper—history as refuse, childhood as headline.
Carlton S. King’s district attorney is no cardboard knight. He enters the narrative through a montage of municipal reports—ledgers, affidavits, mug shots—suggesting justice itself is a bureaucratic collage. His attraction to Patty is framed in double-exposures: her translucent face superimposed over skyscraper blueprints, hinting that romance and urban development are conjoined twins. When he bails her out, the intertitle reads: “The law is a door—sometimes it opens, sometimes it slams.” A line that could swagger into any 21st-century prestige drama.
William Calhoun’s Ned never twirls a mustache; instead he seduces with silence. In a daring tableau, he teaches Patty poker using a deck illustrated by Toulouse-Lautrec lithographs—art history as corruption. The scene’s chiaroscuro lighting prefigures film noir by a quarter-century, his cigarette ember the sole source of light, a red dwarf orbiting Patty’s pale face.
Cinephiles will detect DNA strands linking this forgotten curio to later melodramas. The inheritance-as-death-wish motif resurfaces in Jewel, while the child-in-peril gambit predates The Pool of Flame by four years. The Swedish street-urchin panorama of Gatans barn feels like a Nordic remake minus the real-estate MacGuffin.
The sole surviving 35 mm print—unearthed in a defunct Montana asylum—was chemically washed in 1978, leaving cyan emulsion streaks that resemble bruises. Kino Lorber’s 4K scan retains these scars, wisely refusing digital botox. I composed a temp score for my screening: toy-piano lullabies warped through tape delay, backed by Bowery field recordings. When Patty signs her name in the final shot, the audio collapses into a single heartbeat—an aural iris closing.
Modern scholars often slot early melodrama into victimology, yet Patty’s arc is one of proto-tenant organizing. She learns to read legal documents upside-down on Wheeler’s desk, weaponizes that literacy, and ultimately reclaims her birthright—not through marriage but through notarized signature. Edwin’s proposal is almost incidental; the true marriage is between woman and deed, a radical merger in an era when wives couldn’t own property in several states.
Little Miss No-Account is a pocket-sized revolution—a one-reeler that anticipates Italian neorealism’s children-in-the-street, German Expressionism’s tilted nightmares, and American screwball’s battle-of-the-sexes—yet it remains irreducibly itself: a nickel-plated bullet of social rage. Seek it out in any form you can; even a bootleg on YouTube compressed to rubble still radiates the heat of 1917’s class war. And when that final iris closes on Patty’s lace-draped smile, you’ll realize the film’s true title isn’t about lack—it’s about the audacity to demand account, to seize ledger, land, and life.
IMDb 7.2
1924
Community
Log in to comment.
