5.9/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 5.9/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Love Among the Millionaires remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
If you want to see why Clara Bow was the biggest thing on the planet, this is a pretty good place to start. 🎬
It’s for anyone who loves the chaotic energy of early sound films. If you can't stand scratchy audio or actors who stand perfectly still to talk into a hidden microphone, you'll probably hate it.
Clara plays a waitress named Pepper Whipple. Yes, that is her actual name. It fits her perfectly because she is constantly moving.
She works at a lunch counter for railroad workers. The way she slings hash and snaps back at the guys is the best part of the whole movie.
Her Brooklyn accent is thick. It’s loud, it’s fast, and it totally cuts through the thin sound quality of 1930.
Then Jerry shows up. He’s the son of a railroad tycoon, but he’s pretending to be just a regular guy to win her over. 🚂
Stanley Smith plays Jerry. Honestly? He’s a bit of a wet blanket. He has this very proper way of speaking that makes him feel like a cardboard cutout next to Clara.
There’s a scene where they sing a song together called "Love Among the Millionaires." It’s very cute, but the audio is so thin it feels like the movie might break.
I noticed that the extras in the lunchroom scenes actually look like they are eating real food. That doesn't always happen in these old flicks.
The plot moves pretty fast. Before you know it, Pepper is headed to Palm Springs to meet Jerry's fancy family.
This is where the movie gets that weird, stagey feeling. Everyone stands around in these massive, quiet rooms and talks very slowly.
It reminded me a bit of the stiff acting in The Squall. You can almost feel the actors waiting for their cue to speak.
Jerry’s family is exactly what you expect. They are snobs who look at Pepper like she just crawled out of a coal bin.
We have to talk about Mitzi Green. She plays a character named Penelope, and she does these celebrity impressions.
She does one of Maurice Chevalier that goes on for a really long time. It’s supposed to be the highlight of the scene, I think? 🤷
It’s that weird "precocious kid" vibe you see in movies like School's Out. It's charming for about thirty seconds and then it’s just... a lot.
I think the movie its' self doesn't really know what it wants to be. Is it a romance? A musical? A comedy about poor people being louder than rich people?
The ending feels like someone looked at their watch and realized they were out of time. Everything gets fixed in about two minutes of dialogue.
I love the shots of the old steam engines at the beginning. There is a real sense of power in those machines that the rest of the movie lacks.
If you compare this to something like The Painted Angel, it feels much more alive. Clara Bow just has this way of making even a boring scene feel like something is happening.
Her hair is also a character of its own. It’s wild and frizzy and seems to change shape every time the camera cuts away.
It’s not a masterpiece, but it’s a fun time capsule. It shows a world that was trying to figure out how to talk and sing at the same time.
Sometimes the silence in the rich family's house is so heavy it’s awkward. I think they forgot to add background music in those scenes. 🔊
Overall, it's worth a watch just to see the "It Girl" being her loud, unapologetic self. Just don't expect the plot to stick with you for more than ten minutes after it's over.

IMDb —
1927
Community
Log in to comment.