6.1/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 6.1/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Men of America remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
If you have a soft spot for grainy, black-and-white B-movies from the early thirties, you will probably find something to like here. If you need snappy dialogue or, you know, a budget that covers more than two locations, you might want to look elsewhere. It is essentially a "good folks vs. bad guys" story, but it feels like it was filmed in someone’s backyard, which is kind of the charm.
William Boyd holds the whole thing together, obviously. He has that look of someone who has seen everything twice and isn't impressed by any of it. Watching him deal with these city slickers is a bit like watching an adult try to teach a toddler how to behave in a library. Except the toddler has a Tommy gun.
There is this one scene where the gangsters are trying to act tough, but they just look like they’re waiting for a bus. It’s odd. You can tell they aren't used to the open air of the West, and the camera lingers on them for an extra second or two, just to make sure we get that they feel out of place. It borders on awkward, but it works.
I found myself wondering if they actually built the town sets or if they just found an abandoned dirt road and put a few crates out. It feels so small. There isn't much of the epic scope you see in The Scarlet Streak or those bigger productions of the era. It’s just people standing around in the dirt, talking about rights and wrongs.
It’s not as polished as Railroaded, but it has this nervous energy to it. It’s a bit like a rough draft of a better movie that never got finished. That’s not a bad thing, though. Sometimes the mess is the point. I kept waiting for the local authorities to show up, but honestly, I almost forgot they were coming because the town folks were doing just fine on their own. It’s a scrappy little flick. Don't go looking for deep meaning, just enjoy the ride.

IMDb —
1922
Community
Log in to comment.