Cult Review
Senior Film Conservator

Is this worth watching today? Only if you are a huge nerd for animation history or you just have six minutes to kill and want to see something very strange. If you need a story that actually makes sense, you are going to hate this. It is basically just a series of gags that happen near a river.
I found myself watching this after going through a rabbit hole of early 20th-century shorts. It is a Walter Lantz production, and you can tell he was still trying to find his footing before the Woody Woodpecker days. The rabbit character—I think it is supposed to be Oswald—looks like he is made of actual rubber bands.
The whole thing feels very frantic. Characters just sort of bounce into the frame and then bounce back out for no reason. It does not have the polish of something like Around the World in 80 Days, but that is obviously because it is a silent cartoon from 1926.
There is this one scene with a boat that just... stretches. It does not even look like a boat after a while. It just becomes a long black line. I love that about these old cartoons. They didn't care about logic at all back then.
The print I watched was pretty rough. There was a lot of flickering and some black spots that kept appearing in the top right corner. It almost felt like the movie was disintegrating while I was watching it. Which honestly adds to the vibe if you ask me.
It is way less structured than something like The Monster. There is no real buildup. It just starts with a guy playing an instrument and then everything goes chaotic. I noticed a small detail where a character's ears disappear for like three frames. Someone probably got tired of drawing them that day.
I think the music in these old shorts is what makes or breaks them. The version I found had this tinny piano track that felt a bit off-beat. It made the whole experience feel like a fever dream. If you watch it on mute, it is actually a bit creepy.
One thing that struck me was how much mud there actually isn't in a movie called Mississippi Mud. It is mostly just white space and some shaky lines representing water. But the way they animate the splashing is actually pretty clever for the time.
I wonder if people back then thought this was peak comedy. There is a gag involving a fish that I did not quite get. It just kind of stares at the camera and then explodes? Or maybe it just deflated. It is hard to tell with the film grain.
Comparing this to something like The Tame Cat is funny because they both have this weird, jittery energy. But Lantz has a specific way of drawing eyes that always looks a bit surprised. Everyone in this movie looks like they just saw something they weren't supposed to see.
The ending is very abrupt. Like, the screen just goes black mid-action. I thought maybe my file was broken, but no, that is just how they ended things sometimes. No big finale, just *poof*, it is over.
It is not a masterpiece. It is barely even a movie in the modern sense. But it is a fascinating artifact. You can see the DNA of everything that came later, even if it is buried under a lot of dirt and bad frame rates.
I wouldn't go out of my way to find it again. But I am glad I saw it. It makes you appreciate how far things have come since the 20s. Sometimes it is nice to just watch some black and white chaos for a few minutes and not worry about "themes" or "character arcs."
Anyway, if you like seeing where animation started, give it a look. Just don't expect it to change your life or anything. It is just a weird little relic from a time when movies were still figuring out how to exist.

IMDb —
1924
Community
Log in to comment.