Cult Review
Senior Film Conservator

Honestly, only if you’re a complete nerd for 1930s movie trivia. If you want a story or even a point, you will probably hate this. It’s for people who like to see how weirdly uncomfortable celebrities looked when they weren't on a set.
It’s not quite a documentary and it’s definitely not a movie. It feels more like someone dug up a home video from a parallel universe where Hollywood was a strange, low-stakes summer camp. The whole thing moves at the speed of a tired turtle.
You catch these glimpses of famous faces, and they’re just standing there, looking like they’d rather be literally anywhere else. It reminded me a bit of the awkward energy in Stout Hearts and Willing Hands, where you can feel the effort of trying to be charming. Except here, there’s no script to hide behind.
There is this one shot where someone is waving at the camera, and they keep waving for about ten seconds too long. It’s painfully human. You can almost see the person thinking, "Is the camera still on? Should I stop now?"
I couldn't help but compare the pacing to the more frantic energy in Mile-a-Minute Kendall. This one is the complete opposite. It’s slow, dry, and feels like it’s decaying while you watch it. 📽️
There isn't any big conclusion or deep thought here. It just stops. One minute you're watching a guy in a suit talk, and then—*poof*—it's over. It’s not profound, but it is a weird little artifact of a time when cameras were a novelty even for the people who worked in front of them.
Maybe it’s not "good" in any standard sense. But it’s definitely something. Like finding a lost postcard in a library book. A bit dusty, slightly faded, and probably not meant for you anyway.
Year
1933
IMDb Rating
—

Editorial
Deciphering the legacy of transgressive cult cinema.
Community
Log in to comment.