5.1/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 5.1/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Second Honeymoon remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
Alright, so 'Second Honeymoon.' Is it worth digging up today? Well, that depends. If you're into old films with *really* questionable relationship advice, then yeah, it’s a pretty interesting peek. Folks who love seeing how comedies tackled marital boredom back in the day will find some gems here. But if you expect modern sensibilities or even a consistently laugh-out-loud script, you'll probably find it a bit… baffling. It’s certainly not for everyone.
The whole setup is just wild. Henry Roquemore plays the husband, who’s perfectly nice but apparently a snooze-fest. Josephine Dunn is Evelyn, the bored wife. And then there's the 'friend,' who I think is Edward Earle, deciding that the best way to fix a marriage is to *engineer a fake affair* for Henry. I mean, come on. That’s a bold move, even for fiction.
You can tell the movie is trying to be a lighthearted romp, but the premise itself feels kinda manipulative. There's this one scene where Evelyn is presented with 'evidence' of Henry's supposed philandering, and she just looks *stunned*. It’s a quiet moment, but you can almost see the gears turning in her head, the dawning realization. The shot holds for a bit too long, though, making it almost comical instead of genuinely dramatic. Like, okay, we get it, she’s surprised. 😂
Henry Roquemore's performance is pretty understated. He spends a lot of the film looking vaguely confused, which, honestly, is probably how I'd look if my friend decided to mess with my marriage for my own good. He's got this sort of bewildered puppy dog look that really sells his innocent obliviousness to the whole scheme.
The pacing is a bit uneven. Some parts rush through, and others linger. There's a sequence where the 'other woman' (who is in on the plot, naturally) is making some overly dramatic phone calls to Henry. Her acting is *quite* theatrical, which I suppose was the style, but it feels a bit much now. It’s like she’s trying to convince the audience more than Evelyn that this is a serious thing.
One of the more memorable bits is when the friend is trying to coach Henry on how to act guilty. He’s demonstrating these furtive glances and nervous coughs. Henry just can't quite get it right. It’s a small detail, but it makes Henry feel more human, more like an ordinary guy caught in a ridiculous situation. It’s not a big laugh-out-loud moment, but it’s *charming*.
The film doesn't really delve deep into the psychological impact of all this trickery. It's more about the mechanics of the prank and the eventual, predictable outcome. You can almost feel the movie going, 'See? She appreciates him now!' But I kept thinking, 'What if she *didn't*?' What if she just left him? That’s a whole other movie right there.
The whole thing feels like a product of its time. The idea that a little emotional turmoil would 'fix' a marriage is... well, it’s a perspective. It’s a very simple story, without a lot of layers. The emotional beats are pretty straightforward, almost sketched out.
So, yeah. 'Second Honeymoon.' It’s a curious little film. Not a masterpiece, not even a hidden gem really, but it’s got its moments. Especially if you like watching old films wrestle with domestic drama in a way that feels utterly alien to modern sensibilities. It’s a brief, odd journey.

IMDb 6.9
1916
Community
Log in to comment.