6.1/10
Archivist John
Senior Editor

A definitive 6.1/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Sharps and Flats remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
So, Sharps and Flats. Is it worth your time today? If you're into those quiet, smoky jazz club vibes, or just love seeing a musician really *struggle* with their art, then yeah, give it a shot. But if you're looking for big plot twists or anything with a fast pace, you'll probably be checking your watch. It’s definitely not for everyone, maybe just a handful of us who really *get* it. 🎷
This film is one of those that doesn't just tell you a story; it kinda *immerses* you in a feeling. Right from the jump, with the opening credits playing over a really long, slow pan of a dimly lit stage, you know what kind of ride you're in for. It’s all about atmosphere, you know?
The pacing is… deliberate. Some might say slow. Me? I think it forces you to lean in. There are moments, like when the camera just sits on the drummer's face for what felt like an eternity, sweat beading up, completely lost in the rhythm. You can almost *feel* the stick hitting the snare. That close-up, it was almost uncomfortable.
And the sound design! Oh man, the sound. It’s not just music; it’s the clinking of glasses, the murmur of the crowd, the squeak of a chair. These little background noises are so crisp, they pull you right into that cramped club. Like you’re sitting at a table right there. 🎧
There's a scene, early on, where the pianist, Martha, she's trying to work out a new piece. She keeps hitting the same wrong note, over and over. It's not a dramatic scene at all, just her, alone, frustrated. You see her run her hand through her hair, then restart. It’s just this tiny, perfect glimpse into the grind. No big speeches, just the _clink_ of the key and her sigh.
The director, I can't remember their name right now, but they made a choice to really focus on the hands. So many shots of fingers on keys, on frets, on drumsticks. It really highlights the physicality of making music. You see the calluses, the tension. It’s real.
One particular moment that stuck with me involved a bassist, a young guy, who keeps looking nervously at the band leader. He’s clearly trying to impress, trying not to mess up. There's this one reaction shot of him, after a particularly complicated solo from the saxophonist, and he just gives this tiny, almost imperceptible nod. No words, just respect. It was a nice touch.
Then there's the whole dynamic with the saxophone player, Marcus. He's clearly the 'star' of the outfit, but he's got this quiet arrogance. Not flashy, but you know he knows he's good. When he walks away from a conversation, he doesn't look back. Just gone. That was… something.
The film doesn't really give you a clean resolution for anything. It just kinda… ends. With them playing another set, same club, same faces. A few new ones, maybe. It’s a bit like life, I guess. You just keep going. 🤷♀️
There was this one strangely long shot of the empty stage before the band came on. Just a microphone stand, a few chairs. It went on about 30 seconds too long, and the silence started to feel awkward rather than emotional. I was like, 'okay, we get it, it's empty.' But then the lights came on, and it kinda worked.
It’s not a film that'll be talked about for its grand cinematography or shocking plot twists. It's more about the texture of things. The worn velvet seats in the club, the way the light catches the brass of a trumpet. The little details. Daring Deeds it is not.
And honestly, it's not a movie you'll immediately recommend to everyone. It asks for patience. It asks you to just *be* there. But if you let it, it gives you a glimpse into a world that feels incredibly authentic. Like a secret peek behind the curtains.
I left feeling a bit reflective, a little quiet myself. It's a mood piece, through and through. Not for a big Friday night, but maybe for a rainy Sunday afternoon. When you have time to just… listen.👂

IMDb 6.2
1917
Community
Log in to comment.