5.6/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 5.6/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. The Cohens and Kellys in Atlantic City remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
Alright, so you’re thinking about digging up The Cohens and Kellys in Atlantic City? 🤔 Well, it’s a curious watch, for sure. If you’re into silent-era comedies, or specifically interested in how early talkies handled broad humor and ethnic stereotypes, then yeah, give it a shot. Anyone expecting modern pacing, subtle jokes, or something that hasn’t aged a *bit* awkwardly will probably find it a tough sit. This one’s a real time capsule, loud and proud.
The premise, if you haven’t guessed from the title, involves the perpetually feuding Cohen and Kelly families. They’re off to Atlantic City, which, even in 1929, was the place to be for a bit of seaside ruckus. The film leans hard into their usual squabbles, just with a new backdrop of boardwalks and bathing suits. It's less a tightly woven plot and more a series of escalating comedic mishaps.
George Sidney, as Mr. Cohen, has this wonderful, exasperated energy that really sells his character. He's always on the verge of a minor stroke, especially when Mr. Kelly (Walter Brennan, surprisingly early in his career!) is around. Brennan here is more of a blustering, less refined foil, a far cry from some of his later roles. It's actually a trip just to see him so young.
There’s this whole sequence involving a misunderstanding about a lost wallet on the boardwalk. It escalates from a quiet accusation to a full-blown public spectacle, with both families shouting over each other. The crowd scenes have this oddly empty feeling sometimes, like half the extras wandered off for a taffy break. But then a few moments later, it’s packed. Go figure.
One scene, I remember, features Kelly trying to impress some ladies by *flexing* near the ocean. He slips on a patch of seaweed and takes an ungraceful tumble. It’s pretty basic physical comedy, but the way he flails, arms windmilling, is genuinely chuckle-worthy. You can almost feel the movie trying to convince you this moment matters, and for a second, it does. 😂
Being an early talkie, the sound design is… rudimentary. The dialogue often feels a little stiff, like everyone is trying hard to hit their marks for the microphone. It’s not quite as fluid as what came even a few years later. There’s a distinct *clunkiness* to some of the conversations, almost like they’re still figuring out how to make words work with moving pictures.
There's a moment where Nora Lane’s character, maybe one of the younger Kellys, is trying to have a serious conversation, but a crashing wave sound effect completely drowns her out. It’s probably unintentional, but it adds to the charm of how raw everything feels. It’s a good reminder of how far technology has come, honestly.
The pacing, too, is interesting. Some scenes go on about 20 seconds too long, and the silence (or just the ambient beach noise) starts to feel awkward rather than emotional. Then suddenly, it cuts sharply to another scene. No smooth transitions, just *boom*, you’re somewhere else. It keeps you on your toes, if nothing else.
“They call this a vacation? It’s more aggravation than home!” — A line I swear someone says, or at least *should* say, in this movie. It sums up the vibe perfectly. 😂
The movie gets noticeably better once it stops taking itself seriously, which it mostly does from the get-go anyway. It’s at its best when it embraces the sheer silliness of two families constantly butting heads over nothing. The rivalry feels less mean-spirited and more like an old habit.
Ultimately, The Cohens and Kellys in Atlantic City isn't going to redefine cinema for you. But for a peek into a very specific kind of early Hollywood comedy, with its clumsy charm and sometimes baffling choices, it’s worth a watch. Just go in knowing you’re signing up for a piece of film history, not a modern blockbuster. It’s got a certain *oomph* to it, even if that oomph is sometimes just loud yelling.

IMDb 7.6
1926
Community
Log in to comment.