Cult Review
Senior Film Conservator

Is 1929's The Love Doctor worth digging up today? Probably not for everyone. If you adore early talkies, the slightly theatrical acting, and a really simple, almost stage-like plot, you might find some charm here. Otherwise, it’s a bit of a historical curiosity that might just bore you stiff. It’s a definite skip if you’re looking for anything fast-paced or deeply dramatic.
The whole thing kinda rides on this one joke: a doctor, Gerald Sumner (Morgan Farley), thinks he can literally *cure* love. He’s a bachelor, naturally. And quite confident about it all. His office is just opening, and in walks Bud Woodbridge (Richard Dix), suffering from what Sumner instantly diagnoses as “love sickness.” You can almost feel the movie trying to convince you this is a serious medical issue. 😂
Sumner’s remedy for poor Bud? A trip to the country, lots of rest, and distilled water. Yes, distilled water. That’s the big cure. It’s pretty funny to see how earnestly everyone takes this, especially Bud.
Enter Virginia Moore (June Collyer), Sumner’s nurse. She's the sensible one, but also secretly smitten with her boss. She goes along with the plan, supervising Bud in the country, maybe hoping that Sumner’s own visits will somehow give *him* a case of the love sickness. It’s a classic setup, really. Her subtle glances at Sumner are probably the most interesting part of the early scenes.
Things get properly tangled when Grace Tyler (Winifred Harris), the fickle debutante Bud is lovesick over, decides she’s actually quite taken with Doctor Sumner. So now you have Bud chasing Grace, and Grace chasing Sumner, while Virginia quietly hopes Sumner notices her.
There are some truly **quaint** moments. The way they talk about love, as if it’s a minor ailment that just needs the right prescription. It feels so far removed from modern romance. One scene has Grace practically demanding Sumner marry her, and his reaction is just this baffled, slightly uncomfortable look. *He doesn't get it.*
The pacing is very much of its time. Things move slowly. You get long stretches of dialogue that feel like they're directly from a stage play. The camera doesn’t move much. It’s less about dynamic visuals and more about the delivery of lines. The crowd scenes have this oddly empty feeling, like they couldn’t afford too many extras. Or maybe they just didn't think it was important. 🤷♀️
Morgan Farley as Sumner is perfectly cast as the somewhat oblivious, earnest doctor. You can almost feel his character’s gears grinding as his medical theories about love start to unravel. Richard Dix as Bud is... well, he’s lovesick. He does a good job of looking forlorn. But it’s June Collyer’s Virginia who brings a bit of grounding to the whole affair. Her quiet exasperation and hopeful glances are a nice touch.
Eventually, of course, the doctor gets a taste of his own medicine. His grand theories about curing love fall apart when he finds himself *in it*. It’s predictable, sure, but in a comforting way for a film this old. The ending wraps things up neatly, almost too neatly. Love, it turns out, cannot be cured. What a revelation! ✨
Overall, The Love Doctor is a peek into early Hollywood’s take on romantic comedy. It’s not going to blow anyone away, but it has a certain gentle charm. If you're a film history enthusiast, you might enjoy seeing how these simple stories played out back then. For everyone else, it’s probably one for the 'maybe someday' list. Unless you just really, really love distilled water.

IMDb 6.1
1917
Community
Log in to comment.