5.9/10
Archivist John
Senior Editor

A definitive 5.9/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. The Olympic Games, Amsterdam 1928 remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
Okay, let's be real. “The Olympic Games, Amsterdam 1928” isn't for everyone. If you're hoping for a slick, fast-paced sports movie, you’re going to be bored stiff.
But if you’ve got a real soft spot for history, for seeing how things were, and you appreciate a quiet kind of observation, then yeah, this is **absolutely worth your time**. It’s a fascinating, almost meditative watch for the right person.
This isn't a film with a plot, obviously. It's a documentary, a record, of the Ninth Olympiad. You get to see the athletes, the crowds, the city, all captured on what must have been incredibly heavy cameras back then.
The first thing that hits you is the silence. No roaring crowds, no commentary, just the grainy black and white footage unfolding. It makes you lean in, trying to imagine the sounds that were really there.
The camera work is pretty static for the most part, a lot of wide shots. You really get a sense of the scale of these events, even in 1928. The stadium looks absolutely packed in some frames.
I found myself focusing on the little things. Like the swimmers’ goggles, or lack thereof. They just dive right in, almost casually, and the water splashes up in these beautiful, slow-motion-feeling bursts.
And the track and field events are amazing. The runners, they don't have the fancy gear we see today, just simple shorts and vests. Their form is so different, yet powerful.
Bela Szepes-Strauch, the javelin thrower, she's one of the few names we know from this film. Her throw is captured; it’s a really elegant movement, almost balletic, even in the slightly blurry footage.
There's a scene with the marathon runners, just trudging along dusty roads. It goes on for a bit, and you can almost feel the exhaustion radiating off the screen. It made me thirsty just watching them.
The whole experience of watching this is so different from a modern sports broadcast. There are no instant replays, no close-ups on the agony or triumph on an athlete's face. You just see the event unfold.
One part, the diving competition, really caught my eye. The divers just… *hang* in the air for a moment. You can really appreciate the grace of it without any distracting noise or quick cuts.
The crowd scenes are also something else. Everyone is dressed so formally, even at a sporting event. Hats everywhere! It’s such a stark contrast to today’s casual stadium wear.
It’s not just about the sports; it’s a time capsule. You catch glimpses of Amsterdam itself, the architecture, the way people moved. It feels like you’re peeking through a very old keyhole.
There’s a charm to its rawness, its complete lack of pretense. The movie isn’t trying to tell you how to feel. It just shows you what happened, and lets you make of it what you will.
Sometimes a shot lingers a bit long on something that seems minor, like a banner flapping in the wind. But even those moments add to the feeling of being right there, observing.
The medal ceremonies are surprisingly touching. The athletes stand so straight, so proud, accepting their laurels. It’s a simple dignity you don't always get in today’s flashy presentations.
So, yeah, it’s not for everyone. But if you’re into film history, or just want to really see the past without a filter, give “The Olympic Games, Amsterdam 1928” a go. You might find yourself quietly mesmerized, like I was. It's **a neat bit of history** that way. 🎥

IMDb —
1918
Community
Log in to comment.