DbcultAccessing Vault...
Cult Review
Archivist John
Senior Editor
There is a moment—roughly seventeen minutes in—when the camera simply stares at the cobblestones while the earth itself seems to swell, as though Solana were a sleeping leviathan inhaling its own history. No intertitle intrudes; only the wheeze of a harmonium off-screen tells you the world is dreaming. Compare this to the cataclysmic tableaux of The Last Days of Pompeii, where every tremor is announced by choral panic and falling cornices. Here, the apocalypse tiptoes, barefoot and sly.
Villiers, billed merely as “The Drifter,” possesses the hollowed gaze of someone who has already watched his own funeral through the wrong end of a telescope. His cheekbones catch the nitrate glare like cracked porcelain; when he smiles, the corners of his mouth remember every lie he will ever tell. In a medium that rewards theatrical semaphore, Villiers works in micro-quivers: a blink that lasts one frame too long, a swallow that travels the length of his throat like a guilty secret. You cannot take your eyes off him, largely because he appears to have already vacated his own skin.
The flower itself is never the same hue twice: crimson in dusk-light, arterial scarlet at noon, bruise-magenta by candle flame. Cinematographer Rafael Alarcón (unjustly forgotten, though his hand-cranked iris pulls anticipate by a decade the chiaroscuro of Ultus, the Man from the Dead) lets the tinting vats run riot. Each chromatic shift feels like a heartbeat skipping a bar. The camellia becomes the village’s unreliable narrator: it promises love, delivers obliteration, then shrugs perfume into the salt-rot.
Though released without official score, contemporary accounts mention exhibitors improvising on zither, conch shell, and cracked gramophone. I watched a 2018 Bologna restoration with a trio who played wine glasses filled to the meniscus: every rim-rubbed note trembled like the villagers’ frayed sanity. The result is uncanny—silence becomes a character who refuses to leave the room, clearing its throat whenever someone almost confesses.
While Villiers anchors the myth, the film’s moral centrifuge belongs to the women. Doña Jacinta, all ink-stained cuffs and voltaic grief, telegraphs her sorrow into the ether until even the horizon answers back. Celestina—part Penelope, part arsonist—turns paper and fire into prophecy. Their collusion inside the bell tower, where they splice fragments of every letter ever sent through Solana, feels like a conspiracy of witches rewriting the postal laws of reality. Compare the militant defiance of A Militant Suffragette or the sacrificial stoicism of Hearts of Oak; here, rebellion is quieter, more fungal—it grows in the dark between floorboards.
At 38:42 the beacon ignites a danse macabre: two silhouettes, ten feet tall, wrestle across the church façade. The projection is imperfect—hands detach, heads balloon—so the fight looks like a child’s scrawl come alive. Yet the longer it lasts, the more the illusion hardens into documentary. You stop seeing actors; you see myth being stapled together in real time. When the bullet ricochets, the stone angel’s trumpet chips, and a flake of plaster drifts down like snow. Someone in the audience gasped; I tasted copper, as though I’d bitten my own tongue on behalf of the universe.
The arrival of the schooner stuffed with doppelgänger mannequins is the film’s most overt nod to Expressionism—think The Clue crossed with the feverish biblical tableaux of The Life and Passion of Jesus Christ. But instead of moral binaries, we get ontological slapstick: villagers caress their own wax effigies, discover the cheeks warmer than expected, and recoil as though touching a corpse that still has courtesy left to fake. The sequence lasts under three minutes yet colonizes the rest of the narrative; every face you see afterwards might be wax preparing to sweat.
Linear storytelling is politely shown the door. Events recur with microscopic mutations: the same dog crosses the same alley twice, once tail-up, once tail-between. A church bell rings at 2 a.m. though its rope was severed reels earlier. Either the editing is berserk, or the village itself is stuck in a Möbius strip. The effect predates the narrative labyrinths of Don Juan by a dozen years, but where that later film winks at its own sophistication, The Sunny South gulps laudanum and forgets what century it is.
We never read the entire stanza, only fragments slipped between sprockets: “…name the nameless / unname the named…” The rest is eaten by nitrate rot. This partial erasure is genius; it allows every viewer to furnish their own cosmic punch-line. I filled my notebook with possibilities, each one more illicit than the last, until the margins resembled the spiral of camellias on the salt-flat. The film understands that the most seductive secrets are the ones we finish in private.
That closing droplet contains not just a reflection but an entire refracted ecosystem: miniature Lázaros, miniature villages, miniature viewers watching miniature films ad infinitum. The image quivers, threatening to roll off the screen and onto your lap. I caught myself cupping my hands, absurdly worried it would drown my shoes. When the lights came up, the woman beside me was crying into a red camellia she swore she hadn’t brought in.
Silent cinema has no shortage of calamities and conversions, of last-minute rescues by deus ex machina. The Sunny South offers no such comfort; it rescues you from certainty, then abandons you in a salt-flat of self-interrogation. It is both artifact and organism, a film that watches you back. Seek the restoration, project it in a room with no fire exits, bring wine glasses or zithers or simply the percussive clamor of your own heart. Let the whirlwind tear you open. You will leave lighter, having shed the cumbersome skin of knowing what happens next.
Community
Log in to comment.
Loading comments…
