5.2/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 5.2/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. The Umbrella remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
If you have seventy minutes to spare and love dusty, crackly old British comedies, The Umbrella is a neat little find. But if you hate scratchy audio and actors who project like they are on a theatre stage, skip it immediately. ☔
It is basically a "quota quickie" from 1933, meaning it was made fast and cheap to satisfy local laws. This means you get a lot of energy but not a lot of polish.
The whole plot hinges on two bumbling thieves who just got let out of prison. One of them has been carrying around an umbrella this whole time, and yes, the handle is packed with stolen jewels.
It is a beautifully simple setup that feels like an old comic strip. You know exactly what is going to happen, but watching them try to prevent it is the fun part.
Harold French plays his part with this frantic, sweaty energy that made me laugh. He keeps clutching that umbrella like it is his firstborn child.
There is a great, messy scene in a crowded train carriage where he almost leaves it behind. You can see the exact moment his face goes pale when he realizes.
The camera just hangs on him for a second too long, and it becomes genuinely funny. It has that cheap, stagey energy you might recognize from The Hard Guy.
Everyone is talking at the same time and trying not to bump into the furniture. Speaking of furniture, the sets look like they were put together during a quick lunch break.
Look closely at the background in the pub scene. The "stone" walls literally wobble when someone closes a heavy door too hard. 🫨
I love details like that because it shows how rushed these old productions were. It makes the whole film feel alive and slightly dangerous, like it might fall apart at any second.
The writers—including Laurence Meynell—clearly did not overthink the dialogue. It is mostly just characters shouting "What?" and "Where is it?" at each other in posh voices.
But the pace is so quick that you do not really mind the lazy writing. It just keeps moving.
Kay Hammond shows up later and completely steals her scenes. She has this wonderful, sarcastic drawl that makes the men look even sillier than they already do.
There is a bit where she rolls her eyes at a cop that made me chuckle. She did more with one look than the main guys did with five minutes of yelling.
The ending feels very abrupt, almost like they ran out of film and just decided to stop shooting. One minute they are chasing each other, and the next, the credits are rolling.
It is not a masterpiece, but it has a very cozy, rainy-afternoon sort of charm. If you can find a decent copy, it is absolutely worth a watch.

IMDb 6.3
1932
Community
Log in to comment.