1.9/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 1.9/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Ushadrutyun! remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
Right off the bat, if you’re looking for a fast-paced thriller or anything with a definitive, satisfying answer by the end, then Ushadrutyun! is probably not for you. You’ll be bored, maybe even a little annoyed. But if you’re the type who likes to sink into a film, let it breathe, and pay close attention to the small stuff, then this one might just be a quiet gem. It’s a mood piece, really, more than a traditional story. For me, I kinda dug it. 🧐
The film centers on Anna, played by L. Mednikyan, who lives in a pretty sleepy village. Her life feels... *uncomplicated*. We see her morning routine, the way she makes tea, the way she walks down the same path every day. It’s all very deliberate, maybe even a bit too much at first. You wonder, what’s the point here?
But then, things start to happen. Or rather, they *don't* happen, or they happen slightly differently. A teacup moved just an inch. A door creaks when it usually doesn't. Mednikyan’s face during these moments, it’s just fantastic. There’s a scene where she’s staring at a flowerpot on her windowsill, and her eyes do this tiny, almost imperceptible twitch. You can practically see her brain trying to reconcile what she remembers with what she's seeing. It’s _so good_.
A. Madatyan, the writer, really leans into this slow build. It’s not about grand conspiracies, it's about the erosion of certainty in everyday life. The dialogue is sparse, which means every line S. Akopyan delivers as the skeptical neighbor feels weighty. He keeps dismissing Anna’s worries, and it just makes her look more isolated.
There’s this moment when Anna is in the town square, and the crowd, it feels... off. Not too many people, but the way they move, it's just a little bit out of sync. Like they’re all rehearsing something, but not quite together. One old man just stands there, staring at a pigeon for what feels like a minute too long. What was that about? It's these tiny, *odd* details that really make the film.
The pacing is, well, it’s something. There are long stretches of just watching Anna observe things. I took a note, `12 mins just staring at wall?` – okay, not quite, but it felt like it. The camera often stays wide, letting you take in the whole scene, forcing you to look for what Anna is looking for. This really works for the film's title, doesn't it? Ushadrutyun!, meaning 'Attention!' It’s like the film is asking you to literally pay attention.
The sound design plays a huge part here too. The usual village sounds – distant dogs, wind, children playing – they’re all there. But sometimes, they cut out abruptly, leaving this heavy, almost *unnatural* silence. Or a sound gets repeated, a subtle echo, making you second-guess if you heard it correctly the first time. It makes you feel as unsettled as Anna.
Kh. Abrahamyan, as the village elder, has this one scene where he’s telling a story that makes no sense. He just keeps rambling, and Anna’s face is just blank, trying to follow along. It's a perfect example of the film’s subtle discomfort. You're never quite sure if the characters are in on some joke, or if they’re just... different.
And the ending? Oh boy. Don’t expect a neat bow. It just sort of… ends. Leaves you with this feeling of lingering dread, not quite knowing what to believe. It’s bold, I’ll give it that. But also, a little frustrating if you like your mysteries solved. I'm still thinking about it, which I guess is the point. 🤔
So, is it worth watching? If you like films that challenge your perceptions and don’t spoon-feed you answers, yes. If you appreciate great, subtle acting, especially from L. Mednikyan, definitely. But be warned, it’s a slow, quiet burn. Bring a cup of tea, and be ready to pay very, very close attention.

IMDb —
1928
Community
Log in to comment.