Stan Laurel stars as a tramp, "a fierce, fiery, fearless, two-fisted loafer." Trouble announces itself as a plate loaded with doughnuts on a windowsill.

Is this film worth watching?Short answer: Yes, but only if you are a student of comedy history or a Stan Laurel completist. It is a fascinating relic that shows a comedy legend still trying to find his definitive voice before the magic of the duo years.This film is for viewers who enjoy the raw, unpolished energy of 19...

still_frame

still_frame
Comparing the cinematic DNA and archive impact of two defining moments in cult history.

Scott Pembroke

Reggie Morris
Community
Log in to comment.
"Is this film worth watching?Short answer: Yes, but only if you are a student of comedy history or a Stan Laurel completist. It is a fascinating relic that shows a comedy legend still trying to find his definitive voice before the magic of the duo years.This film is for viewers who enjoy the raw, unpolished energy of 1920s slapstick and those interested in the evolution of the 'tramp' archetype. It is definitely not for those who require high-definition production values or the refined, rhythmic ..."

Charles King
Tay Garnett
United States


Deep dive into the cult classic
Discover similar cinematic experiences
A Directorial Spotlight on Scott Pembroke