A short film that turns gender roles on their head in a comedic utopia. Cross-dressing comedy (1926) by F.
Is this 1926 silent short worth watching in the modern era? Short answer: Yes, but primarily as a fascinating sociological artifact rather than a laugh-out-loud riot. It is a film for those who appreciate the evolution of comedy and the history of gender representation on screen; it is emphatically not for those who re...
publicity
still_frame
still_frame
still_frame
still_frame
still_frame
still_frame
still_frame
Comparing the cinematic DNA and archive impact of two defining moments in cult history.
Richard Wallace
Reggie Morris
Community
Log in to comment.
"Is this 1926 silent short worth watching in the modern era? Short answer: Yes, but primarily as a fascinating sociological artifact rather than a laugh-out-loud riot. It is a film for those who appreciate the evolution of comedy and the history of gender representation on screen; it is emphatically not for those who require high-definition spectacle or nuanced, modern character development.This film works because it commits entirely to its central conceit without blinking. It fails because the s..."
Katherine Grant
Stan Laurel, Malcolm Stuart Boylan, Hal Yates, Frank Terry
United States
Deep dive into the cult classic
Discover similar cinematic experiences
A Directorial Spotlight on Richard Wallace
