Cult Review
Senior Film Conservator

You should definitely watch this if you’re into those old-school comedy duos who rely on physical size differences for jokes. It’s a 1929 flick, so it has that jittery, fast-motion energy that makes everyone look like they’ve had way too much coffee.
If you hate movies where the plot is based on one incredibly dumb idea, you’ll probably want to skip it. But for everyone else, it’s a pretty harmless way to spend an hour.
The whole thing stars Karl Dane and George K. Arthur. They were a big deal back then, basically the 'big guy and little guy' archetype before Laurel and Hardy really took over the world.
Karl is this massive, hulking sailor and George is this tiny, nervous-looking fellow. Seeing them stand next to each other in matching sailor suits is half the comedy right there.
The story is simple. One of them is being a pain, so the other hires a hypnotist to put him in a trance.
The hypnotist character is great because he looks like he wandered out of a much scarier movie. He has these piercing eyes and a mustache that looks like it’s barely hanging on with spit and prayer.
When the hypnosis actually happens, the movie gets really strange. The way they filmed the 'trance' is just a lot of staring and slow movements.
There’s a scene where the hypnotized buddy starts acting like a total different person while they are on the ship. The extras in the background look like they aren't quite sure if they should be laughing or just staying out of the way.
I noticed one guy in the back of the deck scene who just stares at the camera for like five seconds. It’s those little mistakes that make these old movies feel real.
The female lead is Josephine Dunn. She’s mostly there to look pretty and be the prize the guys are fighting over.
She does a lot of that 1920s 'clasping hands to the face' acting. It’s charming, but she doesn't get much to do other than react to the chaos.
It reminded me a bit of The Cocoanuts which came out around the same time. Both movies have this frantic, 'we are just making this up as we go' feeling.
The sets are clearly just painted backdrops in some scenes. You can see the floor transition from actual wood to a flat studio surface if you look closely enough.
I love the specific textures of the film stock from this era. Everything looks a bit silver and ghostly.
There is a gag involving a bucket of water that goes on for way too long. You know exactly what is going to happen, but they keep teasing it.
When the bucket finally tips, the reaction shot is so delayed it actually becomes funny again. It’s like the actor forgot he was supposed to be wet for a second.
If you've seen Chivalrous Charley, you’ll recognize the same kind of 'hapless guy' energy here. It’s a very specific vibe from the late silent era.
The movie is mostly silent but you can tell it was made right when sound was becoming a thing. There’s a lot of exaggerated mouthing of words that they probably hoped people could lip-read.
I definately think the middle section drags a bit. They spend a lot of time just running around the hallways of the ship.
But the chemistry between the two leads keeps it afloat. Karl Dane has this way of looking confused that is actually pretty endearing.
It’s not as polished as something like The New Babylon, but it isn't trying to be art. It’s just trying to make you chuckle at a guy in a trance.
The ending is a bit of a letdown, to be honest. It just sort of resolves itself without a big climax.
It’s like they hit the 60-minute mark and decided that was enough work for the week. I don't blame them.
It’s a lot better than Flapper Fever, which I found a bit too annoying. This one stays just on the right side of silly.
I wonder if people in 1929 were actually scared of hypnotists. The movie treats it like a magical superpower rather than a psychological trick.
Anyway, if you like boats, big guys, and goofy eyes, give it a go. It’s a nice little slice of history that doesn’t take itself seriously at all.
It’s the kind of movie you watch while eating popcorn and not thinking too hard about the 'art' of cinema. Sometimes that is exactly what you need.

IMDb —
1922
Community
Log in to comment.