6.5/10
Senior Film Conservator

A definitive 6.5/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Day of Reckoning remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
If you have a soft spot for dusty 1930s dramas where people make incredibly bad decisions for love, Day of Reckoning is worth a lazy Sunday afternoon. It is not a masterpiece, but it has that weird pre-code desperation that keeps you watching.
If you can't stand old movies where characters talk like they are reading from a telegram, you will probably turn this off in ten minutes. This is pure melodrama.
The story is pretty simple. John (played by Richard Dix) loves his wife Dorothy way too much, or at least he loves buying her expensive things she probably didn't even ask for.
To keep her happy, he starts stealing from his boss. This is never a good plan, especially in 1933 when everyone was already broke.
Enter George, a supposedly "good friend" who actually just wants to steal Dorothy for himself. He literally hires a lawyer to make sure John gets the worst prison sentence possible.
It is a wonderfully evil plan. Conway Tearle plays George with this greasy, slicked-back hair energy that makes you want to throw popcorn at the screen.
"A friend who helps you go to jail is not a friend you want around."
Richard Dix is... well, he is Richard Dix. If you saw him in The Three Godfathers, you already know his acting style.
He has this very specific way of looking deeply concerned, like he left the oven on at home. His face just doesn't move much, but he really sells the sad husband vibe.
I kept waiting for Dorothy to realize what a creep George is. But she is written as slightly clueless, which gets a bit frustrating after a while.
There is a great scene where John gets arrested and the camera just stays on his face for way too long. It is meant to be tragic, but it feels like the director forgot to yell cut.
The transition from marital drama to prison tragedy is like hitting a brick wall. It doesn't have the grand scale of something like Woman in the Moon, obviously.
It is just a small, slightly messy stage play put on film. Some of the dialogue is so clunky it made me chuckle, especially when John screams about his love.
But honestly? I didn't hate it. It has a fast pace because back then they didn't waste time with filler scenes.
If you like melodramas that feel like a warning leaflet about living beyond your means, give it a go. Just don't expect anything too deep.

IMDb —
1920
Community
Log in to comment.