DbcultAccessing Vault...
5.4/10
Archivist John
Senior Editor
A definitive 5.4/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Driftwood remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
If you are looking for a breezy, sun-drenched tropical romance, Driftwood (1928) might catch you off guard. It is worth watching today primarily for Marceline Day’s understated performance and a visual style that favors shadows over postcard-perfect sunsets. This is a film for fans of late-era silent cinema who appreciate how much can be said through a slumped posture or a lingering look at the tide. It will likely bore those who need high-octane adventure or the fast-talking wit of the early sound era that followed just a year later.
By 1928, silent film grammar had reached its peak. Director Christy Cabanne doesn't need title cards to tell us that Daisy Smith (Marceline Day) is exhausted. The opening sequences establish her status as a 'floater'—a polite 1920s term for someone society would rather see disappear—with a series of shots that emphasize her isolation even in a crowd. Unlike the more theatrical falls from grace seen in films like The Triumph of the Rat, Day’s portrayal of Daisy feels modern because it is so quiet. She isn't wringing her hands; she is just tired.
When Daisy lands on the island, she encounters Jim Curtis, played by Don Alvarado. Alvarado was often marketed as a 'Latin Lover' archetype, but here he plays against that heat. He is Jim, a piece of 'human driftwood' who has checked out of life. The early scenes between them are the film’s strongest. There is a palpable awkwardness in their first few interactions. They don't fall into a cinematic embrace immediately; instead, they circle each other like two stray dogs who aren't sure if the other is going to bite or share a meal.
One specific moment that sticks out occurs in the small hut where Jim has been rotting away. The lighting is low, almost oppressive. As Daisy begins to clean and organize the space, there is a shot of Jim watching her from the shadows. You can see the conflict in his eyes—he resents the intrusion of 'civilized' habits, yet he is clearly mesmerized by the presence of another human who doesn't look at him with contempt. It’s a grounded, physical bit of acting that avoids the over-the-top gesticulation common in earlier silents.
The middle of the film slows down significantly, and this is where some modern viewers might lose patience. The 'regeneration' of the two characters is a slow process. We see them fishing, walking the beach, and gradually shedding the defensive shells they built in the city. The pacing drags in the second act, particularly during a few overlong sequences involving the local islanders. While these scenes are intended to show the couple’s integration into a simpler life, they feel a bit like filler compared to the intense psychological drama of the first twenty minutes.
Visually, however, the film remains engaging. The South Seas setting is clearly a studio backlot for the most part, but the cinematography makes excellent use of it. There are several night scenes where the water looks like black ink, and the moonlight is used to create sharp, silver silhouettes. It gives the island a lonely, purgatorial feel rather than a paradise. This isn't a vacation; it’s a hiding place. The costume design also tells a story: Daisy starts in tattered, heavy fabrics that look out of place and ends in simpler, lighter clothes that suggest she is finally breathing again.
The final act shifts gears as the couple decides to return to the United States. This is where the film's 'regeneration' theme hits its peak. It’s a bold choice for a story about outcasts—usually, these films end with the couple staying in their tropical Eden. By choosing to go back, the characters are reclaiming their agency. They aren't just running away; they are deciding to face the society that rejected them.
There is a slight tonal inconsistency here. The transition from the moody, isolated island life to the resolve of the finale feels a bit rushed. One minute they are content in their isolation, and the next, they are practically packed and ready to go. A few more scenes showing the specific catalyst for this change—beyond just 'love'—would have made the ending feel more earned. However, the final shots of them on the ship, looking toward a horizon that represents a challenge rather than an escape, are genuinely moving.
Driftwood is not a revolutionary piece of cinema, but it is a deeply competent and atmospheric one. It captures a specific moment in film history where the visual language was sophisticated enough to handle complex adult themes of depression and social ostracization without needing to scream them at the audience. It’s a quiet film about two people finding the strength to stop drifting. If you can handle the slower middle section, the performances and the moody cinematography make it a rewarding experience for anyone interested in the final years of the silent era.
IMDb —
1921
Community
Log in to comment.
