DbcultAccessing Vault...
4.9/10
Archivist John
Senior Editor
A definitive 4.9/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. Film 11 remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
Is 'Film 11' a film that demands your immediate attention in the modern cinematic landscape? Short answer: yes, but with significant caveats. This isn't a film designed for casual Friday night viewing; it is, first and foremost, a historical artifact of immense value, offering a rare, unvarnished window into a specific time and place.
This film is absolutely for historians, ethnographers, and anyone with a deep interest in early American cinema, the social history of Oklahoma, or the pioneering work of African American filmmakers like Solomon Sir Jones. It is decidedly NOT for viewers seeking a conventional narrative, high production values, or contemporary entertainment. Its appeal is intellectual and historical, not visceral or dramatic.
Solomon Sir Jones' 'Film 11' is less a conventional film and more a moving archive. Shot by the pioneering African American Baptist minister and filmmaker, this collection of vignettes from Muskogee, Oklahoma, circa the 1920s, offers an unparalleled, if unpolished, look at community life. Its strength lies not in plot or character development, but in its sheer existence and the candid nature of its observations.
The film meanders through the physical spaces of Muskogee: the sturdy, often modest, residences that housed its citizens; the functional, sometimes imposing, offices where commerce and administration took place; and the somber, respectful architecture of its funeral homes, silent testaments to life’s inevitable end. Each frame is a snapshot, a visual data point in a larger, unwritten history.
What truly elevates 'Film 11' beyond mere architectural survey is its inclusion of Native American communities. At a time when mainstream cinema often ignored or caricatured indigenous peoples, Jones' camera offers a more direct, if still distant, gaze. These moments are brief, yet profoundly significant, hinting at the complex cultural tapestry of Oklahoma.
This film works because it provides an authentic, unfiltered historical document of a specific American locale and its diverse inhabitants during a pivotal era. It offers a counter-narrative to the often-whitewashed historical records of the time, capturing everyday life with an almost accidental anthropological precision.
This film fails because its lack of conventional narrative structure, character arcs, or thematic development makes it inaccessible to modern audiences accustomed to more traditional cinematic experiences. It demands patience and a specific historical interest that many casual viewers simply do not possess.
You should watch it if your primary interest is in historical preservation, the early days of documentary filmmaking, or a deeper understanding of American social history, particularly concerning African American and Native American communities in the early 20th century.
Solomon Sir Jones, primarily a minister, approached filmmaking with an ethnographic sensibility. His direction in 'Film 11' is characterized by its simplicity and directness. There's no elaborate blocking or complex camera movements; instead, the camera acts as a stationary observer, a silent witness to the unfolding world.
This observational style, while rudimentary by today's standards, is precisely what gives the film its power. Jones wasn't trying to tell a story in the dramatic sense; he was chronicling existence. Think of it less as a director's vision and more as a historian's meticulous collection of evidence.
For example, the lingering shots on specific buildings—a general store, a church, a family home—aren't just establishing shots; they are portraits in themselves. They speak to the economic realities, the community hubs, and the personal spaces that defined Muskogee. It’s a stark contrast to the narrative-driven, often melodramatic cinema of its contemporaries, like The Pursuing Vengeance or The Adventures of Ruth.
One might argue that the lack of artistic flair is a failing, but I contend it’s a strength. It forces the viewer to engage with the raw material, to interpret rather than be told. This isn't passive viewing; it's active historical engagement.
The cinematography of 'Film 11' is, predictably, a product of its time. Shot on rudimentary equipment, the images often possess a grainy quality, with varying exposure and occasional softness. Yet, this technical imperfection contributes to its charm and authenticity. It feels lived-in, not manufactured.
Jones' framing is largely straightforward, often centered, capturing subjects in a head-on or slightly angled manner. There are no dramatic close-ups or sweeping vistas; the beauty is in the mundane. A particular shot of Native American individuals, perhaps gathered for a community event, stands out not for its technical prowess, but for the quiet dignity it affords its subjects.
The choice of black and white, while standard for the era, emphasizes the textures and forms of the Muskogee landscape. The sunlight catches on the clapboard of a house, the shadows deepen the recesses of an office doorway, and the faces of passersby are etched with the realities of their daily lives. It's a testament to how even basic photography can distill the essence of a place.
It works. But it’s flawed. The limitations are obvious, yet they create an aesthetic that modern, hyper-polished productions simply cannot replicate. It’s a window, not a mirror.
The pacing of 'Film 11' is deliberately slow, reflective of its observational nature. There are no quick cuts, no frantic action sequences. Each scene is allowed to unfold at its own rhythm, giving the viewer ample time to absorb the details within the frame. This meditative cadence can be challenging for contemporary audiences used to faster edits and constant stimulation.
The tone is largely neutral, almost journalistic. Jones refrains from overt emotional manipulation or dramatic embellishment. Yet, within this neutrality, there's an inherent sense of reverence for the subjects. The way the camera observes a funeral procession, for instance, is devoid of sensationalism, yet conveys a profound respect for the solemnity of the occasion.
This measured pace and objective tone are crucial to the film's historical integrity. It doesn't attempt to tell you how to feel; it simply presents, allowing the viewer to draw their own conclusions and emotional responses. This is a radical approach, even today, when many documentaries strive for a clear narrative arc and emotional impact.
"'Film 11' asks us to slow down, to observe, and to truly see the past, not as a story, but as a series of moments."
Given the film's documentary style, there are no 'actors' in the traditional sense. Instead, we witness the unscripted 'performances' of everyday people going about their lives. This is where the film's authenticity truly shines. The residents of Muskogee, whether walking past an office, standing outside a home, or engaging in community activities, are presented without artifice.
Solomon Sir Jones' skill here lies in his ability to capture candid moments. The slight turn of a head, a child's curious glance at the camera, the composed demeanor of individuals in a public space—these are the subtle 'performances' that lend the film its human texture. Unlike the staged antics of early comedies like Hot and Cold, everything here feels organic.
The portrayal of Native American individuals is particularly noteworthy. While the camera maintains a certain observational distance, there's an absence of the exoticism or condescension often found in contemporary ethnographic films. Instead, we see individuals simply existing within their environment, a rare and valuable perspective for the era.
It’s a testament to the power of simply pointing a camera at reality. The 'performances' are genuine lives, unfolding before our eyes, untouched by script or directorial manipulation. This is perhaps its most surprising observation: the quiet power of simply being.
The true weight of 'Film 11' rests on its immense historical significance. Solomon Sir Jones was a trailblazer, one of the earliest known African American filmmakers to document Black communities and, in this instance, Native American life. His work provides an invaluable counter-narrative to the often-biased or absent mainstream depictions of these groups during the early 20th century.
This film, along with his other surviving works, offers primary source material for understanding the social, economic, and cultural conditions of these communities. It’s a visual ethnography, capturing details of dress, architecture, social interaction, and daily routines that would otherwise be lost to time or confined to written records.
Its legacy is not that of a cinematic achievement in the traditional sense, but as a foundational document in the history of independent and ethnographic filmmaking. It challenges us to reconsider what constitutes 'film' and where true value lies in cinematic output. Is it the spectacle, or the honest, unadorned record of human existence?
'Film 11' is not a film to be enjoyed in the conventional sense; it is a film to be studied, appreciated, and preserved. Its cinematic merits, judged by modern standards, are minimal, but its historical and cultural significance is immeasurable. Solomon Sir Jones has bequeathed us a precious time capsule, a raw, unfiltered look at a segment of American life often overlooked or misrepresented.
While it won't thrill or entertain in the way a contemporary blockbuster might, its quiet power lies in its authenticity. It’s a testament to the fact that sometimes, the most profound cinematic experiences come not from elaborate storytelling, but from the simple, honest act of observation. For those willing to engage with history on its own terms, 'Film 11' offers a uniquely rewarding, albeit challenging, viewing experience. It’s a vital piece of our collective past, deserving of diligent attention.
IMDb —
1917
Community
Log in to comment.
Loading comments…
