6.4/10
Archivist John
Senior Editor

A definitive 6.4/10 rating for a film that redefined the boundaries of cult cinema. L'eau du Nil remains a cornerstone of transgressive art.
So, L'eau du Nil. Is it worth your afternoon?
Probably not if you need things to blow up every ten minutes or if you can't stand grain on your screen. But if you like those old, flickery movies that feel like a fever dream about Egypt, then yeah, maybe give it a look.
It is definitely for the person who likes to look at 1920s hats. It is not for someone who hates reading title cards every thirty seconds.
The whole thing feels like a very long, very expensive postcard from 1928. It’s got that specific French way of making a love story feel like the actual end of the world.
Lee Parry plays Mary, and she has these eyes that just take up the whole screen. Seriously.
Sometimes she looks genuinely terrified, but other times it feels like she's just trying to remember if she turned the stove off before leaving for the desert.
The plot is mostly about a love triangle. You’ve seen it before, but maybe not with this much linen clothing.
There is this one scene by the river where the light hits the water just right. It’s actually quite pretty, even if the film quality makes it look like it was shot through a dirty window. 🌊
Jean Murat is the guy she's supposed to be with, I think? He’s very "stiff upper lip" even though he's French.
He walks around like he’s wearing a corset that’s two sizes too small. It makes his scenes feel a bit clunky.
I noticed that in the crowd scenes, some of the extras are just standing there looking directly at the camera. It’s kind of funny because they clearly didn't know they weren't supposed to do that.
One guy in the background of the marketplace scene actually looks like he’s trying to sell a rug to the cameraman.
The movie tries to be deep about the "Water of the Nile" and fate. It doesn't really land for me, honestly.
It’s more like a soap opera with better scenery. It reminded me a bit of Beauty and the Beast in how it handles dramatic shadows.
Not because it’s as good as that one, but because the French directors back then really loved their high-contrast lighting.
There's a moment where a character enters a tomb and the lighting suddenly gets really dark. You can barely see what's happening for like two minutes.
I think it was supposed to be atmospheric. I just thought my screen was dying.
The costumes are great, though. Lots of big hats and flowing dresses that look very impractical for the desert.
Mary wears this one white dress that stays perfectly clean despite her literally crawling through the sand. It’s a miracle of 1920s laundry, I guess. 🧼
The pacing is... well, it’s a silent movie from the 20s. It takes its sweet time.
If you’re used to modern stuff, this will feel like it’s moving in slow motion.
But there is something nice about the silence. You can hear your own thoughts, which is usually a bad thing, but here it works.
It reminds me a bit of The Lost Paradise in how it treats these big, sweeping emotions. Everything is life or death.
Every look is a declaration of war or a proposal of marriage. There is no middle ground.
I liked the guy playing the "other" man, René Lefèvre. He has a bit more life in him than the lead.
He does this weird little shrug in one scene that felt like the only natural movement in the whole film.
The ending is a bit of a mess. It happens so fast after two hours of almost nothing happening.
It’s like the director realized they were running out of film and just decided to wrap it up.
Wait, I forgot to mention the boat. There’s a boat trip that goes on forever.
I think we see every single palm tree on the Nile twice. Maybe three times.
Is it a masterpiece? Nah. Not really.
But it’s a weirdly relaxing watch if you’re into that sort of thing. It’s like looking at an old family photo album of people you don't actually know.
You might find it boring, and I wouldn't blame you. But if you want to see what "exotic" looked like to a Parisian in 1928, this is it.
It’s definitely better than some of the other stuff from that year. It actually has a pulse, even if it's a slow one.
I wonder if they had to use a lot of water on set because everyone looks very sweaty. Or maybe that was just the film grease.
If you're looking for a thrill, maybe watch Hot Water instead for some laughs. This one is strictly for the drama-lovers.
Final thought: the sand looks really itchy. 🌵
The music in the version I watched was a bit repetitive too. It was just the same three piano chords over and over.
But hey, that’s the charm of the era. You take what you can get.

IMDb 9.1
1925
Community
Log in to comment.